Difference between revisions of "Talk:The TattleMaster"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There are to be two "columns" of news for the paper. I am assuming that the larger column will be used for longer stories, and the smaller column for shorter, bullet-point-style items. (Although not necessarily bulleted, if you know what I mean.) The longer items will have places in the template for a title, date, story, and author's name/signature. The shorter items for only a date and news item. Does that sound about right for those items? --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] | There are to be two "columns" of news for the paper. I am assuming that the larger column will be used for longer stories, and the smaller column for shorter, bullet-point-style items. (Although not necessarily bulleted, if you know what I mean.) The longer items will have places in the template for a title, date, story, and author's name/signature. The shorter items for only a date and news item. Does that sound about right for those items? --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, do you envision the main root page [[The TattleMaster]] being the active story page, like the [[TRL]], with old news being archived to subpages? Or should the root page just be an intro page, like the [[II]], with each "issue" being a separate subpage? (I prefer the root page to be the active page, but that's just my preference.) --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] | ||
Revision as of 04:17, 10 July 2007
There are to be two "columns" of news for the paper. I am assuming that the larger column will be used for longer stories, and the smaller column for shorter, bullet-point-style items. (Although not necessarily bulleted, if you know what I mean.) The longer items will have places in the template for a title, date, story, and author's name/signature. The shorter items for only a date and news item. Does that sound about right for those items? --Indirik
Also, do you envision the main root page The TattleMaster being the active story page, like the TRL, with old news being archived to subpages? Or should the root page just be an intro page, like the II, with each "issue" being a separate subpage? (I prefer the root page to be the active page, but that's just my preference.) --Indirik
