Difference between revisions of "IJARG"

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(scratched out Reilwin)
m
 
Line 38: Line 38:
  
 
Feel free to post comments or suggested changes in the discussion! We need to work this out so we can all agree to it!
 
Feel free to post comments or suggested changes in the discussion! We need to work this out so we can all agree to it!
 +
 +
 +
[[Category:Newspapers]]

Latest revision as of 12:12, 8 October 2018

Article I

  • IJARG stands for "International Journalistic Appropriate Reporting Guidelines".
  • IJARG guidelines are to be kept and watched by all IJARG members.
  • There is no IJARG central council, thus each newspaper is accountable to itself, and all other IJARG newspapers.

Article II

  • The IJARG is present to define how articles can be appropriately written, allowing for "journalistic creativity", and for the preservation of the truth.
  • Factual truths must NOT be lied about. (OOC- If the game says such and such a realm won a battle, then they did indeed win a battle!)
  • Facts and truths are open to interpretation. There is more than one way of looking at an event.
  • IJARG papers are committed to providing quality work, even if it is laden with bias and half-truths.

Article III

  • IJARG papers are committed to not writing, or sponsoring the writing, of any articles specifically dedicated to the insulting or "bashing" of any other paper, IJARG, OCPAU, or otherwise.
  • IJARG papers are free to slip in comments about the aforementioned other papers in articles with a clear purpose other than newspaper bashing.
  • IJARG papers are free to bash, insult, and verbally maul each other in whatever non-published form they choose(OOC- discussions).
  • IJARG papers must back up insults or mudslinging with reasons. Merely insulting a paper and saying, "You're stupid" will not suffice. We try and have quality articles, so we will have quality insults as well.

Article IV

Version

  • IJARG Draft 2


Feel free to post comments or suggested changes in the discussion! We need to work this out so we can all agree to it!