Talk:Fontan (Realm)

Hey, I would like to know how you managed the images in the infoboxes. I would like to do the same thing for Eston Tariq

And I would like to do the same thing for quite a few realms, actually (among them Norland, :D)Vellos 30 December 2005 23:11 (CET)

The source code of the infobox is here. If you mean the gray and green one well I made it myself, with Gimp. Leave a message on my talk page and I will see if I can work out one for your realm. -- Gsklee 31 December 2005 06:01 (CET)

I'll put up some of the Fontan history later when I get a chance. Putting most of my efforts into page creation rather then content addition. If it's not done by April someone send me a note in-game Loren 15 March 2006 10:40 (CET)

Yo, I am looking forward to that :D -- Gsklee 16 March 2006 13:48 (CET)

i had a go with the history. Former Fontan TL and hopefully Fontan TL again if i get a new acc.-- former gomez- current archbane

Add the ancient history! There's a lot previous to the war with Caligus, you youngunns! -- Neoro 02:54, 4 November 2006 (CET)

hey Fontanese people, i make some alternative for your pixelate banner, if you want take a look and give a feedback [[1]] --Vecchioratto 12:03, 22 April 2008 (CEST)

The one with the Sphinxs is very nice. Baldur Mekorig

---

Hamilton's ban? Why would something as insignificant as a single noble being banned go on a permanent history of the Realm page? A Duke, perhaps, but a common knight who never held a title in the realm...?

Wasn't this supposedly the trigger event that led to the Krimml Incident? If so, I'd think it was an important event to be chronicled. It's not every day the capital duchy of a realm switches allegiance to an enemy realm. Maybe not in such a prominent place, though. --Indirik 15:39, 5 September 2008 (CEST)

Can't say for sure. If it was, then I suppose so, but I think it's better as a mention in Krimml Incident than its own major topic.

---

5 on 1 War - went to link to this, and discovered it wasn't even mentioned! Feel free to make whatever changes you want. Just wanted a link and placeholder.

"(5 on 1 war is the same as the Swelling Tyranny)" - ah, I see now. couple of changes I'd recommend: 1) it's in the wrong order; 2) Ironside's story is written in the present tense, and missing certain facts that later readers won't know. Now that Caligus has made peace, CoF is gone, and Westmoor is the new enemy, there are already things that don't make sense.

I have dated the monograph of Armstrong. It was not really meant to be an exhaustive history of the current situation, more like a primer, or a timecapsule, for the next official update. It is easy to forget unless we write it down. :) I don't know what better order the current history can be in. Maybe Swelling Tyranny followed by Krimml Incident and Hamilton's Ban? (if that one should still be a main link...), Actually, the Krimml Incident should come before Swelling Tyranny, because it provides a greater background to the events mentioned in S.T. Hmm, D.west.ton 06:49, 16 September 2008 (CEST)

I think we should keep it in chronological order. As far as I can tell the Swelling Tyranny picks up where the Krimml Incident left off. And the page about Hamilton's ban should have an opposite opinion for objectivity. I see it as the precursor to the Krimml Incident so it should go before. --Vita Family 07:41, 16 September 2008 (CEST)

---

Fontan (Realm) - linked to Fontan Page, its been bugging me for too long --The Scipii Family