Taselak (SEI)/Tribune/7th Edition

http://wiki.battlemaster.org/images/TaselakIcon_large.gif	Taselak Tribune: News from Glorious Taselak!
Price: Free for Taselakians, 5 coppers for everyone else	Editors: Dennis, Jet, Lynsey and others from Taselak!	Issue Number: 7
Troops pile up along our borders, but we stand firm in the face of such might

Other Editions of the Taselak Tribune:			Special Editions:
1st Edition (Oct-Nov 2006) 2nd Edition (Nov-Dec 2006) 3rd Edition (January 2007) 4th Edition (February 2007)	5th Edition (March 2007) 6th Edition (April 2007) 7th Edition (May 2007) 8th Edition (June 2007)	9th Edition (August 2007) 10th Edition (September 2007)	Toren-Ikalak Treaty April Toren Rebellion: Statement by Averyll Statement by Zellion

9 Cavalry decimated at Little Big Cirannor

3 May 2007 ([South-East Island/Cirannor) by Lynsey Habap

Ikalakan Marshal Kainaq led some 260 cavalrymen to support the continuing takeover of [South-East Island/Cirannor

Kail in Taselakian hands

2 May 2007 (Cirannor) by Lynsey Habap

As predicted, Kail is now back in Taselakian hands. Toren troops are apparently attempting to foment rebellion in Lesthem, though one would expect them to order a full retreat to Toren Stronghold rather promptly, as Taselakian forces are now free to punish them for their insolence. Rumors have even been heard that Ikalak will temporarily take possession of Toren's eastern provinces to prevent the free-ranging Taselakian Army from siezing them. Dark days for the theocracy, indeed. Perhaps when Averyll is the only one left in Toren, she will be granted her wish of having no dissent in the cold castle.

A treaty broken

2 May 2007 (Belus) by Lynsey Habap

With the takeover of Eraus and Moeth as well as the takeover being attempted in Kheif, Ikalak appears to have broken the treaty between Toren and Ikalak. Of course, one expects that the leadership of Toren fully agreed to this, as they have demonstrated an inability to hold their own against Taselakian forces. With the Ikalakan takeovers, Toren had managed to retake Kail, the loss of which had cut off most of their realm from the capital. One wonders about the growth of independence movements reported in the more distant regions of their realm. Toren has apparently admitted to their ally that they cannot fulfill their end of the bargain, set back in October, some six months ago. Assuming Toren survives longer than Taselak, will Ikalak feel any obligation to turn over those regions to their weak sister before driving them into the ground?

Kail dangling

2 May 2007 (Belus) by Lynsey Habap

In recent weeks, with the Sisters (Seggelin and Lesthem) firmly in the hands of Taselak, the region which gets traded back and forth between Toren and Taselak is now Kail. The initial loss of this region led Toren to allow Ikalak to default on the treaty between the two realms, but that does not seem to have prevented Taselak from working to regain the region.