Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wish List/Advanced Federation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sanguinius (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Well I for one don't like this idea. This can be done just by using the normal and current Federation. | Well I for one don't like this idea. This can be done just by using the normal and current Federation. | ||
Grab a bunch of single or double city realms, and from them you choose who is to lead the group. And in that Realms capitol, you build a Senate Guild, and have members from all member states join. | Grab a bunch of single or double city realms, and from them you choose who is to lead the group. And in that Realms capitol, you build a Senate Guild, and have members from all member states join. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :That's true. And there's a reason there's a comment sections. So all this stuff can be kept on one page. This has it's advantages though. It's more unified and official. This however, limits it two just 2 realms, since you do get the perks it should be no problem. You don't want to have a bunch of realms in a Federation. They start ganging. This is setup the way it is, so that you can't gang on someone easily. It's unrealistic, but more balanced. --[[User:Kagurati|Kag]] 26 March 2006 10:12 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 10:12, 26 March 2006
Well I for one don't like this idea. This can be done just by using the normal and current Federation. Grab a bunch of single or double city realms, and from them you choose who is to lead the group. And in that Realms capitol, you build a Senate Guild, and have members from all member states join.
- That's true. And there's a reason there's a comment sections. So all this stuff can be kept on one page. This has it's advantages though. It's more unified and official. This however, limits it two just 2 realms, since you do get the perks it should be no problem. You don't want to have a bunch of realms in a Federation. They start ganging. This is setup the way it is, so that you can't gang on someone easily. It's unrealistic, but more balanced. --Kag 26 March 2006 10:12 (CEST)
