Difference between revisions of "Talk:New Westmoor"
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Did someone supply them to you IC? If not, you don't have access to them. The RPs were only sent to the entire realm as flavor text but if you noticed, the ICly written letters were addressed solely to the other party. [[User:Tanos|Tanos]] 22:44, 6 February 2012 (CET) | Did someone supply them to you IC? If not, you don't have access to them. The RPs were only sent to the entire realm as flavor text but if you noticed, the ICly written letters were addressed solely to the other party. [[User:Tanos|Tanos]] 22:44, 6 February 2012 (CET) | ||
| − | This is correct. The letters regarding duel challenges were private matters, hence why there is this ambiguity regarding who did and said what. The RPs just provided a little background to what was happening. | + | This is correct. The letters regarding duel challenges were private matters, hence why there is this ambiguity regarding who did and said what. The RPs just provided a little background to what was happening. [[User:Ravier|Ravier]] 22:56, 6 February 2012 (CET) |
Revision as of 23:55, 6 February 2012
Colors
Could you please not use black on blue background? Its rather hard to read. --M2rt 16:31, 12 June 2011 (CEST)
- I have to agree. That color scheme makes reading very difficult.
I don't want to lose the blue as it's the color of the realm but I've altered the brightness a bit and hopefully this will make it easier to read. Should be able to see the links fine now. --Mathros 22:15, 15 June 2011 (CEST)
Style
Thanks to my sister who actualy knows how to do html and this kind of thing (I haven't a clue) I've managed to put the whole page into one big table so that it should display correctly all the time no matter what size screen people are on. Let me know if this causes any black holes or zombopocalypses. --Mathros
Letters from the Duel
Did someone supply them to you IC? If not, you don't have access to them. The RPs were only sent to the entire realm as flavor text but if you noticed, the ICly written letters were addressed solely to the other party. Tanos 22:44, 6 February 2012 (CET)
This is correct. The letters regarding duel challenges were private matters, hence why there is this ambiguity regarding who did and said what. The RPs just provided a little background to what was happening. Ravier 22:56, 6 February 2012 (CET)
