Difference between revisions of "Talk:Feature Requests/Marshal and Sponsor Prestige Bonuses and Penalties for Battles"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Instead of just limiting it to marshals, shouldn't it just be whoever leads the army into battle? --~~~~) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Instead of just limiting it to marshals, shouldn't it just be whoever leads the army into battle? --[[User:Athins|Athins]] 22:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC) | Instead of just limiting it to marshals, shouldn't it just be whoever leads the army into battle? --[[User:Athins|Athins]] 22:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Only Marshals can lead armies into battles. Well, I suppose '''Vice''' Marshals, too. All nobles already get prestige for leading their troops into battles. This would be a small extra bonus for the leaders of the armies, and those that sponsor them. --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] ([[User talk:Indirik|talk]]), [[BattleMaster Wiki:Editors|Editor]] ([[BattleMaster Wiki:User-Editors Talk|talk]]) 12:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:01, 7 April 2010
Instead of just limiting it to marshals, shouldn't it just be whoever leads the army into battle? --Athins 22:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Only Marshals can lead armies into battles. Well, I suppose Vice Marshals, too. All nobles already get prestige for leading their troops into battles. This would be a small extra bonus for the leaders of the armies, and those that sponsor them. --Indirik (talk), Editor (talk) 12:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
