Difference between revisions of "Template talk:FamilyLink"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I don't think this template serves a good purpose. There are way too many people who don't have a region page, which will result in lots of red links. Then there are several different nami...) |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
--[[User:Tom|Tom]] 23:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 23:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :True. I'll look at coding in an "if exists" type check using parser functions. i.e. Only show a link to the family page if it exists. I forget the exact function, but I know there is one. --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 03:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:12, 26 March 2009
I don't think this template serves a good purpose. There are way too many people who don't have a region page, which will result in lots of red links. Then there are several different naming schemes. And all properties for character names are string properties - for these reasons.
Yes, it would be nice to have, but I don't think it will work even remotely as well as the regions things.
--Tom 23:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- True. I'll look at coding in an "if exists" type check using parser functions. i.e. Only show a link to the family page if it exists. I forget the exact function, but I know there is one. --Indirik 03:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
