Difference between revisions of "Wish List/Advanced Federation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
To be more specific, it'd do the following. | To be more specific, it'd do the following. | ||
| − | + | *Nobles would be able to message either the 1st part, the 2nd part, or both. | |
| − | + | *Nobles would be able to message one person of either part. | |
| − | + | *Nobles would be able to message the ruling players of either part. | |
| − | + | *Each part would have it's own taxes, but the currency would be the same. | |
| − | + | *Each capital would serve as a recruiting center for both, but only have troops of that resepective part. | |
| − | + | *Troops would still suffer effects of not being in their realm, but they would be lessened. | |
| − | + | *Bonds can be sent from a character of one part to the character of the other. | |
| − | + | *An AF can only be formed between TWO realms. No more. This is to keep realms from ganging on other realms more than they do already. | |
It'd work much like a Federation. Only it'd still be two realms, but somewhat less seperated. Each noble would vote on the hierarchy of their realm, but be able to talk to nobles in other realms. Military actions would of course be much more coordinated. | It'd work much like a Federation. Only it'd still be two realms, but somewhat less seperated. Each noble would vote on the hierarchy of their realm, but be able to talk to nobles in other realms. Military actions would of course be much more coordinated. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Comments?== | ==Comments?== | ||
| − | Ok, so I've put my thoughts down. Anyone have any comments? Put this in this area.<br><br><br><br><br> | + | Ok, so I've put my thoughts down. Anyone have any comments? Put this in this area. |
| + | * I like it alot. I see this being used in places with lots of small realms, though. Have, say, 2 AFs, and those two AF's have a normal Fed with each other, forming a giant AF of 4 small realms. Of course, this would make ganging even easier. But it'd be interesting. Maybe have some kind of penalty in too, though, to try and keep it from just making even more ganging. Maybe... make bans from one realm count for the other too, that'd be interesting. But not too much of a penalty in that one.... I dunno. This would just eliminate many of the probs that Tom made specifically to keep people from waging long-term long-range wars, and I dont think he wants that. [[User:Vellos|Vellos]] 26 March 2006 03:54 (CEST)<br><br><br><br><br> | ||
==Help with idea...== | ==Help with idea...== | ||
Main theorizer: [[User:Kagurati|Kag]] | Main theorizer: [[User:Kagurati|Kag]] | ||
Revision as of 03:54, 26 March 2006
What is it?
An Advanced Federation (the name could use changing I'm sure... I'm calling it "AF" here-on), would essentially be an advanced Federation. It'd be of best use on a massive continent where realms were huge and widespread.
It'd combine to realms to the point where diplomacy and hierarchy were combined to a point. As would the message systems.
To be more specific, it'd do the following.
- Nobles would be able to message either the 1st part, the 2nd part, or both.
- Nobles would be able to message one person of either part.
- Nobles would be able to message the ruling players of either part.
- Each part would have it's own taxes, but the currency would be the same.
- Each capital would serve as a recruiting center for both, but only have troops of that resepective part.
- Troops would still suffer effects of not being in their realm, but they would be lessened.
- Bonds can be sent from a character of one part to the character of the other.
- An AF can only be formed between TWO realms. No more. This is to keep realms from ganging on other realms more than they do already.
It'd work much like a Federation. Only it'd still be two realms, but somewhat less seperated. Each noble would vote on the hierarchy of their realm, but be able to talk to nobles in other realms. Military actions would of course be much more coordinated.
I may be wrong, and this may be what a Federation is, but I didn't think so, so I put this down.
Comments?
Ok, so I've put my thoughts down. Anyone have any comments? Put this in this area.
- I like it alot. I see this being used in places with lots of small realms, though. Have, say, 2 AFs, and those two AF's have a normal Fed with each other, forming a giant AF of 4 small realms. Of course, this would make ganging even easier. But it'd be interesting. Maybe have some kind of penalty in too, though, to try and keep it from just making even more ganging. Maybe... make bans from one realm count for the other too, that'd be interesting. But not too much of a penalty in that one.... I dunno. This would just eliminate many of the probs that Tom made specifically to keep people from waging long-term long-range wars, and I dont think he wants that. Vellos 26 March 2006 03:54 (CEST)
Help with idea...
Main theorizer: Kag
