Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Item Box"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Region?) |
m |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Also, instead of providing a low and high price, perhaps we can make a more extensive table that lists just the high price for each region type: mountains, woodlands, badlands, rural, townsland, stronghold, and city? I'll work on an example... --[[User:JFS|JFS]] 17:46, 5 January 2007 (CET) | Also, instead of providing a low and high price, perhaps we can make a more extensive table that lists just the high price for each region type: mountains, woodlands, badlands, rural, townsland, stronghold, and city? I'll work on an example... --[[User:JFS|JFS]] 17:46, 5 January 2007 (CET) | ||
| + | : There was some suggestion regarding regions, on the old talk page, we can always take it out if need be. [[User:Mcsporran|mcsporran]] 18:01, 5 January 2007 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 19:01, 5 January 2007
Convention in price ranges is low-to-high. Also, maybe a small break between those high and low, a dash or a "to". It also looks too blocky, maybe color the text instead of the background. More like:
| Item |
|
? |
(Sorry for the ugly code though, I'm not much for wiki or html coding and just had to find something to work) -- Neoro 05:30, 5 January 2007 (CET)
What exactly is the intended purpose of the "region" entry? I don't think it is serving much of a purpose.
Also, instead of providing a low and high price, perhaps we can make a more extensive table that lists just the high price for each region type: mountains, woodlands, badlands, rural, townsland, stronghold, and city? I'll work on an example... --JFS 17:46, 5 January 2007 (CET)
- There was some suggestion regarding regions, on the old talk page, we can always take it out if need be. mcsporran 18:01, 5 January 2007 (CET)
