Template talk:Item Box

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Convention in price ranges is low-to-high. Also, maybe a small break between those high and low, a dash or a "to". It also looks too blocky, maybe color the text instead of the background. More like:

Item
?, ? ?, ?
?

(Sorry for the ugly code though, I'm not much for wiki or html coding and just had to find something to work) -- Neoro 05:30, 5 January 2007 (CET)


Well, I was trying to fanoodle with the price columns to make it so we could delete the zeros, as I kinda felt they were distracting, but I'm not really happy with it. Its not as space efficient and just looks a bit off. I deleted the zero's on the usable items page, check it and see what you think. Perhaps going back to before I added the "arrow" would be better? --JFS 22:56, 5 January 2007 (CET)
It's looking pretty good now -- Neoro 02:23, 6 January 2007 (CET)


Couple New Ideas

High and Low Price Region Info

Item Price Regions Found Description/Comments
Low High
Item 11   11 11   11 Unknown None
City Woodland

High Price By Region

Item High Prices Regions Found Description/Comments
Item 11   11 11   11 11   11 Unknown None
City Townsland Rural
11   11 11   11 11   11
Woodland Mountain Badlands

For the sake of symmetry I left out "stronghold". --JFS 04:32, 10 January 2007 (CET)

  • I think I prefer this one, it's a bit annoying just to have a huge black line over the entire screen. I do think that the 'regions found' is better the way it is now, than in an apart column like here. Foreign Curs 13:54, 14 January 2007 (CET)

Regions

What exactly is the intended purpose of the "region" entry? I don't think it is serving much of a purpose.

Also, instead of providing a low and high price, perhaps we can make a more extensive table that lists just the high price for each region type: mountains, woodlands, badlands, rural, townsland, stronghold, and city? I'll work on an example... --JFS 17:46, 5 January 2007 (CET)

There was some suggestion regarding regions, on the old talk page, we can always take it out if need be. mcsporran 18:01, 5 January 2007 (CET)
Well there are probably several items that can only be found in certain areas. Region could be like Rural, Mountains, City, Badlands, All, etc-- Neoro 18:11, 5 January 2007 (CET)

New Field

Maybe we should have a field for if this item is useful for a sage. On the same note, the section for the recipes on the theories page could use a similar organization scheme. -- Neoro 02:23, 6 January 2007 (CET)

New template design

I'm not sure I like this new template design. All the price details seem to just run together into a big black block in the middle of the page. Plus the Regions block being vertically centered, and the Comments block being aligned to the top looks... odd. Plus, all the item pricing info is now losts, without a LOT of work to put it back in. --Indirik 21:34, 12 January 2007 (CET)

I wasn't happy with it either so I made another change. Let me know what you think of it. As to the information, I really think it needs to be done, there just wasn't enough info being collected before. Also, the old price data is still there if needed.
I read that Tom is going to make item locations dependent on both region type and location. Any ideas on how to add this detail into the table? I'm thinking, maybe we can just change the * to C,L,M,R; for coast, lake, midland and river? --JFS 19:48, 13 January 2007 (CET)
I like the new one much better. --Indirik 05:05, 14 January 2007 (CET)