Difference between revisions of "Talk:Introduction/Scouts"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I had proposed earlier using a colored text box for roleplays, but there had been some opposition to it. Another font might be appropriate, or some other visual indicator. The non-RP text at the bottom is meant more as a summary and to fill in the gaps, and to direct the reader to more informative pages. --[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 26 July 2005 18:02 (CEST) | :I had proposed earlier using a colored text box for roleplays, but there had been some opposition to it. Another font might be appropriate, or some other visual indicator. The non-RP text at the bottom is meant more as a summary and to fill in the gaps, and to direct the reader to more informative pages. --[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 26 July 2005 18:02 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Another thought: How difficult would it be to add another tab to the top, so that there's a Roleplay:[foo] page, like like a Talk:[foo] page? --[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 26 July 2005 18:25 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 18:25, 26 July 2005
For this - and the other ones like it - I am thinking how we can make the break between roleplaying and game mechanics more obvious - or if we shouldn't seperate them into two pages. Just thinking aloud. --Tom 26 July 2005 17:34 (CEST)
- I had proposed earlier using a colored text box for roleplays, but there had been some opposition to it. Another font might be appropriate, or some other visual indicator. The non-RP text at the bottom is meant more as a summary and to fill in the gaps, and to direct the reader to more informative pages. --Dolohov 26 July 2005 18:02 (CEST)
- Another thought: How difficult would it be to add another tab to the top, so that there's a Roleplay:[foo] page, like like a Talk:[foo] page? --Dolohov 26 July 2005 18:25 (CEST)
