Difference between revisions of "Talk:Family Pages/old2"
(Actual history not a good look.) |
(Shorter!) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
It looks a little lengthy and cluttered with just a short veiw of my family history. I think we should keep it small. Family name and a character list... maybe character list and number of rulerships. | It looks a little lengthy and cluttered with just a short veiw of my family history. I think we should keep it small. Family name and a character list... maybe character list and number of rulerships. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Shorter! == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Make it '''much''' shorter! 4 lines per family? This is going to be a ''long'' page. I would say one bullet point per family, 2-3 lines '''max'''. And frankly, I don't care how many dukes or judges you had. You can put it on the family page if you like, but there is ''no reason whatsoever'' to included it here. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 2 August 2005 12:53 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 12:53, 2 August 2005
Ok the former family page is a bit of a mess. Do we want to have rules on the template of this portal page is to look like? I think Family/Clan name list of characters and a denotation of rulership, deceased, or retired for each character is sufficant. I think alphabetical as well.
I do like Lorens set up however.
Actual history not a good look.
It looks a little lengthy and cluttered with just a short veiw of my family history. I think we should keep it small. Family name and a character list... maybe character list and number of rulerships.
Shorter!
Make it much shorter! 4 lines per family? This is going to be a long page. I would say one bullet point per family, 2-3 lines max. And frankly, I don't care how many dukes or judges you had. You can put it on the family page if you like, but there is no reason whatsoever to included it here. --Tom 2 August 2005 12:53 (CEST)
