Difference between revisions of "Talk:Family Pages/old2"

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Ok the former family page is a bit of a mess.  Do we want to have rules on the template of this portal page is to look like?  I think Family/Clan name list of characters and a denotation of rulership, deceased, or retired for each character is sufficant.  I think alphabetical as well.
+
[[/old]] version of this page
  
I do like Lorens set up however.
+
== How to divide it up ==
 +
The question still remains as to how to divide the page up.
  
== Actual history not a good look. ==
+
We need ''some'' kind of structure, because a list of a hundred or more names just isn't something that is useful.
  
It looks a little lengthy and cluttered with just a short veiw of my family history.  I think we should keep it small.  Family name and a character list... maybe character list and number of rulerships.
+
Let's sum up the structures that were proposed:
 +
* By number of rulerships
 +
* By a self-assessment of fame (as shown on the page at the moment)
 +
* By home island
  
== Shorter! ==
+
What other ideas can we come up with? Let's do a little brainstorming. No criticising, just collection of thoughts, ''then'' we have fun shooting them down, ok?
  
Make it '''much''' shorter! 4 lines per family? This is going to be a ''long'' page. I would say one bullet point per family, 2-3 lines '''max'''. And frankly, I don't care how many dukes or judges you had. You can put it on the family page if you like, but there is ''no reason whatsoever'' to included it here. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 2 August 2005 12:53 (CEST)
+
--[[User:Tom|Tom]] 4 August 2005 11:22 (CEST)
  
== Cool your Jets Tom ==
+
:Hmm.  How about:
 +
:* Straight-up alphabetical order
 +
:* Guild memberships or other (less formal) associations
 +
:* Favorite class
 +
:* Home island ''and'' home realm
 +
:* Length of time in game
 +
:* By region (I'm thinking something like the Domesday Book here)
 +
:* Actual numerical fame value  (We should probably have a "famous families" page for that, anyway)
  
Yeah I figured that, I just was showing a look.  It was all a continued thought on what Loren created.  I got busy on other IRL and game things, and forgot to get it shorter.  The first one was like 15 lines =P
+
:--[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 4 August 2005 16:36 (CEST)
--[[User:ESP|Eric S P]] 2 August 2005 14:34 (CEST)
 
  
== Can we do this better? ==
 
There's got to be a better way to organize this page than over rulership.  (Nevermind that the "Versatile Families" section is a tad on the self-serving side)  Why not organize them by their home island?  There could easily be sub-organizations (such as for rulership) and such.  --[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 2 August 2005 20:30 (CEST)
 
  
== Most everyone on EI? ==
+
We definitely need a sort order that doesn't change all the time, which rules out fame, guild or realm memberships.
  
First this was Lorens Idea and it was I that moved everyone (Loren's included) to the Versatile Families.  I had to have my arm twisted (mostly by Tom) to even participate in the Tiki.  So self servering... sure if that is the way that you want to look at it.
+
Alphabetical is something that we don't have to set up - if everyone puts his family page into a "families" category, we get that for free as an added bonus.
  
Now Home island is just bad.  Unless I completely misunderstand how it works, you have to have X amount of gold in family money and be lucky and watchful to move the family estate and the majority of people that really get into there realm and game don't tend to take from there realm in hours of need, or are on islands that can't send money home if they are able to without hurting there realm.
+
--[[User:Tom|Tom]] 4 August 2005 20:47 (CEST)
  
So even a smaller protion will be able to be on a island that they like and most everyone will be on EI or Atamara.  That would suck.  If you want rearrange the order and put the Ruling and Versatile Families on the bottomIt is far better than island homes.  I will not likely ever go back to EI and that is not representative of my family.
+
:I was actually thinking that it would be a '''feature''' if the order changes -- if it were ordered by fame, for example, it would get people returning to this page every time they gained a fame point--[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 4 August 2005 20:49 (CEST)
  
Or Straight alphabetical, I don't care... just Lorens way has a lot more flair, and that is somewhat what the game is about.
+
== We are restricting the community portal? ==
  
 +
What a great community that will be.  Come on Tom this is not what you are about.
  
:Actually, Atamara is the winner in home world count:
+
And I was serious.  I am not up for a watered down pissing match.  Either get out the tale of the tape (Baseball terminology for ''lets measure'') or water it down completely and just make it a game feature. --[[User:ESP|Eric S P]] 6 August 2005 10:39 (CEST)
+-----------+----------+
+
 
| HomeWorld | count(*) |
+
== Reasons for neutral tone ==
  +-----------+----------+
+
 
  |      NULL |      25 |
+
There are many reasons for remaining neutral on ''this one page'' and leaving the "pissing contest" to the family pages themselves. Two main reasons:
  |        1 |      294 |
+
 
  |        2 |      496 |
+
# There might be hundreds of families on this page. The difference between "1 line, no bragging" and "keep it short, maybe 3-4 lines" is ''10 or more '''pages''' of text''.
|        3 |      41 |
+
# Once the pissing contest starts, it ''will'' get out of control. Someone will not be happy with bragging about himself and will insert a comment on someone else's family. Then that one will want to get even. Then families will be deleted, and down we go.
  |        4 |      16 |
+
 
  |        5 |      23 |
+
This is a final decision. No pissing contest on the intro page.
  |        6 |      87 |
+
 
  |         7 |      36 |
+
--[[User:Tom|Tom]] 7 August 2005 11:42 (CEST)
+-----------+----------+
+
 
:--[[User:Tom|Tom]] 2 August 2005 23:09 (CEST)
+
==Ordering==
 +
:Ok I understand the reason why and I have 2 things I can say about that:
 +
 
 +
:First is that being what you want, alphabetical is the way to go. It is dull, boring, and people will not give a damn.  Starting with me. That is why the family page dropped off on the old tiki... Lorens Versatile got some interest and than it waned again. It is simply not interesting. Your call.
 +
 
 +
:Second is, you are wrong. How do know? Because it has not happened yet. Tiki Family page has been up forever and no has screwed with it. --[[User:ESP|Eric S P]] 7 August 2005 14:20 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
Well, my personal opinion is that the families won't be interesting no matter how you structure them. But I'd suggest making this simply link to a category page, and then everyone who wants to be on that page adds the <nowiki>[[Category:Family]]</nowiki>. Alphabetical order, no effort required. -- [[User:Nicholas|Nicholas]] August 8, 2005 03:48 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
:There's something to that Category idea -- and if it proves to be useless or unmanageable, then we can always try something else later. --[[User:Dolohov|John]] 8 August 2005 06:26 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
::Alphabetical is total nonsense exactly because the category page would do that automatically. Eric, you're just behaving like a spoiled child again. You don't get your way, so you take your toy and don't play anymore.
 +
::The current page is an attempt to have a slightly more interesting ordering, but without the pissing contest part. If it doesn't work, we can change it. I suggest we add the category and link to the category page as an alternative.
 +
--[[User:Tom|Tom]] 8 August 2005 11:37 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
:::''Alphabetical is total nonsense''??  Hmmm.  Oh and this is a pissing contest as is.  Just not a good one. --[[User:ESP|Eric S P]] 8 August 2005 13:09 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
::::I may not have been as clear as I intended to be. Creating a page with manual alphabetical ordering is nonsense because there already is a page with ''automatic alphabetic ordering'' - [[:Category: Families]]. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 8 August 2005 13:16 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
== Family Pages ==
 +
 
 +
Doesn't work as subpages due to the category ordering.
 +
I've moved the existing 3 pages to a unified naming scheme, which will make the category page work.
 +
Eric: If you insist on a dick-measuring page, set one up ''as an alternative'' and we'll see which one works better.
 +
--[[User:Tom|Tom]] 8 August 2005 11:46 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
:Listen, I searched and searched.  I don't know how mto set up an alternative page.  No help to creating alternative pages at all.  And you know what, it was just about having fun with the stats.  I don't really care, I was just having a bit of fun and getting creative.
 +
 
 +
:If somneone knows how to create an alternative page feel free to take it.  I really have to take a break from it all.  The game in all of its fascets sucks for me right now. --[[User:ESP|Eric S P]] 9 August 2005 11:26 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 21:07, 15 May 2006

/old version of this page

How to divide it up

The question still remains as to how to divide the page up.

We need some kind of structure, because a list of a hundred or more names just isn't something that is useful.

Let's sum up the structures that were proposed:

  • By number of rulerships
  • By a self-assessment of fame (as shown on the page at the moment)
  • By home island

What other ideas can we come up with? Let's do a little brainstorming. No criticising, just collection of thoughts, then we have fun shooting them down, ok?

--Tom 4 August 2005 11:22 (CEST)

Hmm. How about:
  • Straight-up alphabetical order
  • Guild memberships or other (less formal) associations
  • Favorite class
  • Home island and home realm
  • Length of time in game
  • By region (I'm thinking something like the Domesday Book here)
  • Actual numerical fame value (We should probably have a "famous families" page for that, anyway)
--Dolohov 4 August 2005 16:36 (CEST)


We definitely need a sort order that doesn't change all the time, which rules out fame, guild or realm memberships.

Alphabetical is something that we don't have to set up - if everyone puts his family page into a "families" category, we get that for free as an added bonus.

--Tom 4 August 2005 20:47 (CEST)

I was actually thinking that it would be a feature if the order changes -- if it were ordered by fame, for example, it would get people returning to this page every time they gained a fame point. --Dolohov 4 August 2005 20:49 (CEST)

We are restricting the community portal?

What a great community that will be. Come on Tom this is not what you are about.

And I was serious. I am not up for a watered down pissing match. Either get out the tale of the tape (Baseball terminology for lets measure) or water it down completely and just make it a game feature. --Eric S P 6 August 2005 10:39 (CEST)

Reasons for neutral tone

There are many reasons for remaining neutral on this one page and leaving the "pissing contest" to the family pages themselves. Two main reasons:

  1. There might be hundreds of families on this page. The difference between "1 line, no bragging" and "keep it short, maybe 3-4 lines" is 10 or more pages of text.
  2. Once the pissing contest starts, it will get out of control. Someone will not be happy with bragging about himself and will insert a comment on someone else's family. Then that one will want to get even. Then families will be deleted, and down we go.

This is a final decision. No pissing contest on the intro page.

--Tom 7 August 2005 11:42 (CEST)

Ordering

Ok I understand the reason why and I have 2 things I can say about that:
First is that being what you want, alphabetical is the way to go. It is dull, boring, and people will not give a damn. Starting with me. That is why the family page dropped off on the old tiki... Lorens Versatile got some interest and than it waned again. It is simply not interesting. Your call.
Second is, you are wrong. How do know? Because it has not happened yet. Tiki Family page has been up forever and no has screwed with it. --Eric S P 7 August 2005 14:20 (CEST)

Well, my personal opinion is that the families won't be interesting no matter how you structure them. But I'd suggest making this simply link to a category page, and then everyone who wants to be on that page adds the [[Category:Family]]. Alphabetical order, no effort required. -- Nicholas August 8, 2005 03:48 (CEST)

There's something to that Category idea -- and if it proves to be useless or unmanageable, then we can always try something else later. --John 8 August 2005 06:26 (CEST)
Alphabetical is total nonsense exactly because the category page would do that automatically. Eric, you're just behaving like a spoiled child again. You don't get your way, so you take your toy and don't play anymore.
The current page is an attempt to have a slightly more interesting ordering, but without the pissing contest part. If it doesn't work, we can change it. I suggest we add the category and link to the category page as an alternative.

--Tom 8 August 2005 11:37 (CEST)

Alphabetical is total nonsense?? Hmmm. Oh and this is a pissing contest as is. Just not a good one. --Eric S P 8 August 2005 13:09 (CEST)
I may not have been as clear as I intended to be. Creating a page with manual alphabetical ordering is nonsense because there already is a page with automatic alphabetic ordering - Category: Families. --Tom 8 August 2005 13:16 (CEST)

Family Pages

Doesn't work as subpages due to the category ordering. I've moved the existing 3 pages to a unified naming scheme, which will make the category page work. Eric: If you insist on a dick-measuring page, set one up as an alternative and we'll see which one works better. --Tom 8 August 2005 11:46 (CEST)

Listen, I searched and searched. I don't know how mto set up an alternative page. No help to creating alternative pages at all. And you know what, it was just about having fun with the stats. I don't really care, I was just having a bit of fun and getting creative.
If somneone knows how to create an alternative page feel free to take it. I really have to take a break from it all. The game in all of its fascets sucks for me right now. --Eric S P 9 August 2005 11:26 (CEST)