Talk:The Rampant Lion

More old comments removed. --Indirik 14:29, 3 April 2007 (CEST)

LoF/Fontan skirmishes?

Second possible reason, the unexplained attacks across the LoF/Fontan border on murderous settings. Seems Fontan held a referendum on whether they should declare war for this reason, which returned a resounding, almost unanimous 'yes'. Are a few unordered skirmishes the reason for destroying Light of Fountain? Maybe more palpable.

It should be noted that Fontan also launched these "unordered" attacks, even before LoF had. So really, that might be the reasoning to crush Fontan. Hint hint. --The1exile 09:59, 3 April 2007 (CEST)

There is a "fifth" possible reason..the one where LoF did not vacate regions she promised to vacate in that said treaty that gave LoF this legitimacy your newspaper claims the realm has. This conflict is Fontanese anyway you want to look at it...the Lofers are/were Fontanese...and brother on brother violence is too often extremely brutal, may the peasants live to see another day from the potential onslaught that awaits there normally peaceful lives. I fear for those that do not fight for a living, that will surely die in the crossfires between what one party says Fontan is, and another that says what it could be. Whatever gets decided, should be decided by the "Fontanese," Lofers or the Democratic Fontanese. Doc

I believe LoF offered to relocate to Westmoor, but Fontan is not interested. There was no timeframe on the treaty and there is no available cities for Light of Fountain to relocate to. A year ago Fontan decided to accept the realm of Light of Fountain by signing a treaty for perpetuity until a city became available for their relocation. Come on Doc, what's the value of a signed treaty these days anyway? -- Thegep 12:43, 3 April 2007 (CEST)