Talk:Red Star Courier

Old comments/discussions removed to make future ones less confusing. --Aeillien 21:44, 17 July 2006 (CEST)

Nice work!

I like it! But I do have one point I would like to question:

"Perdan recouped some of its loses while the northern allies recouped"

Maybe I just don't understand it, but I think that should be Perdan recovered and the north regrouped? --The1exile 19:44, 1 August 2006 (CEST)

Doh. Thanks Alex. I proofread that thing twice and that sentance still flew by. Amazing. Glad you liked it, I'm planning on making it a regular feature at the beggening of the month. So what do you think of my editorial? <evil grin> --Aeillien 20:00, 1 August 2006 (CEST)

Seriosuly, it's great work, and you should keep it up. Mind if I offer a few suggestions though? It's vey minor, but there are things like you've linked to the II but written it like [[II|Itorunt Informer]] which isn't really neccessary; simply lnking to the Itorunt Informer by doing this: [[Itorunt Informer]] will work out fine and save you a bit of time.

Unless of course you are deliberateltly looking to beat the april edition of the II as one of the longest pages on the wiki, in which case, good luck with that. --The1exile 20:24, 1 August 2006 (CEST)

I do silly things like that sometimes. For some reasons pipe style links have become a hard to break habit of mine for no apparaent reason other than the fact that I use them over and over for links to region pages. <chuckles> As far as your april issue, that's pretty impressive, but in a mere two months I've gotten a page that's #51 on the longest page list (my july issue), and only 10k bytes smaller than your April page. (granted 10k bytes is alot of text. :P). I think I'll beat you yet, and without the help of little things like that.--Aeillien 20:56, 1 August 2006 (CEST)