Difference between revisions of "Talk:Perdan (Realm)/Constitution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Not by choice... But since it keeps being bandied about that we're a "Constitutional Monarchy", we probably should have a Constitution. And since no one else can be bothered to write one, I volunteered to give it a try. --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 14:15, 20 September 2007 (CEST) | :Not by choice... But since it keeps being bandied about that we're a "Constitutional Monarchy", we probably should have a Constitution. And since no one else can be bothered to write one, I volunteered to give it a try. --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 14:15, 20 September 2007 (CEST) | ||
+ | ::-chuckle- Such is the way of things. It's looking good though so keep at it.--[[User:Dalakar|Dalakar]] 17:52, 20 September 2007 (CEST) | ||
==Items still needing to be addressed== | ==Items still needing to be addressed== | ||
# Diplomacy Changes | # Diplomacy Changes |
Revision as of 17:52, 20 September 2007
Voting Issues
Should the following items require a Senate vote?
- Selection of new Dukes (Added)
- Selection of new local lords (Added)
- Changes in diplomatic stances toward other realms
- Votes of "No Confidence" for lords and marshals (Added)
--Indirik 02:42, 14 September 2007 (CEST)
Ah another one joining the Constitutioned fold. Warms my heart--Dalakar 04:20, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
- Not by choice... But since it keeps being bandied about that we're a "Constitutional Monarchy", we probably should have a Constitution. And since no one else can be bothered to write one, I volunteered to give it a try. --Indirik 14:15, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
- -chuckle- Such is the way of things. It's looking good though so keep at it.--Dalakar 17:52, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
Items still needing to be addressed
- Diplomacy Changes
- Ratification
- Realm-wide voting procedures
- Provisions for secret ballots?
- Clarify and shorten the voting procedure
--Indirik 14:15, 20 September 2007 (CEST)