Difference between revisions of "Talk:Perdan (Realm)/Constitution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
# Clarify and shorten the voting procedure - ''Done!'' | # Clarify and shorten the voting procedure - ''Done!'' | ||
--[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 14:15, 20 September 2007 (CEST) | --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 14:15, 20 September 2007 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | That's a lot of words to say everyone is free and responsible in their own roles, except for the changing diplomatic relations (not the treaty that encompass this though) and declaring a religion evil. A whole page on how to vote, yet only two things to vote on. I think you have just written a constitution for what basically sounds like an absolute monarchy. | ||
+ | -- [[User:Uceek|Uceek]] 04:27, 28 October 2007 (CET) |
Revision as of 05:27, 28 October 2007
Voting Issues
Should the following items require a Senate vote?
- Selection of new Dukes (Added)
- Selection of new local lords (Added)
- Changes in diplomatic stances toward other realms (Added)
- Votes of "No Confidence" for lords and marshals (Added)
--Indirik 02:42, 14 September 2007 (CEST)
Ah another one joining the Constitutioned fold. Warms my heart--Dalakar 04:20, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
- Not by choice... But since it keeps being bandied about that we're a "Constitutional Monarchy", we probably should have a Constitution. And since no one else can be bothered to write one, I volunteered to give it a try. --Indirik 14:15, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
Items still needing to be addressed
- Diplomacy Changes - Done!
- Ratification - Done!
- Realm-wide voting procedures
- Provisions for secret ballots? - probably not...
- Clarify and shorten the voting procedure - Done!
--Indirik 14:15, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
That's a lot of words to say everyone is free and responsible in their own roles, except for the changing diplomatic relations (not the treaty that encompass this though) and declaring a religion evil. A whole page on how to vote, yet only two things to vote on. I think you have just written a constitution for what basically sounds like an absolute monarchy.
-- Uceek 04:27, 28 October 2007 (CET)