Talk:Perdan (Realm)/Constitution: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (→Voting Issues) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::-chuckle- Such is the way of things. It's looking good though so keep at it.--[[User:Dalakar|Dalakar]] 17:52, 20 September 2007 (CEST) | ::-chuckle- Such is the way of things. It's looking good though so keep at it.--[[User:Dalakar|Dalakar]] 17:52, 20 September 2007 (CEST) | ||
:::Thanks! --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 18:00, 20 September 2007 (CEST) | |||
==Items still needing to be addressed== | ==Items still needing to be addressed== | ||
# Diplomacy Changes | # Diplomacy Changes |
Revision as of 16:00, 20 September 2007
Voting Issues
Should the following items require a Senate vote?
- Selection of new Dukes (Added)
- Selection of new local lords (Added)
- Changes in diplomatic stances toward other realms
- Votes of "No Confidence" for lords and marshals (Added)
--Indirik 02:42, 14 September 2007 (CEST)
Ah another one joining the Constitutioned fold. Warms my heart--Dalakar 04:20, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
- Not by choice... But since it keeps being bandied about that we're a "Constitutional Monarchy", we probably should have a Constitution. And since no one else can be bothered to write one, I volunteered to give it a try. --Indirik 14:15, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
Items still needing to be addressed
- Diplomacy Changes
- Ratification
- Realm-wide voting procedures
- Provisions for secret ballots?
- Clarify and shorten the voting procedure
--Indirik 14:15, 20 September 2007 (CEST)