Difference between revisions of "Talk:BattleMaster Acronyms"

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Do we really need this page? Practically all of it is duplicated on the [[Manual/Lingo]] page. Why not just roll this into that one, and be done with it? --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 16:22, 19 January 2007 (CET)
 
Do we really need this page? Practically all of it is duplicated on the [[Manual/Lingo]] page. Why not just roll this into that one, and be done with it? --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 16:22, 19 January 2007 (CET)
 
:Seconded. Too many acronym/short hand pages flying around. [[User:Jezralhm|Jezralhm]] 23:45, 19 January 2007 (CET)
 
:Seconded. Too many acronym/short hand pages flying around. [[User:Jezralhm|Jezralhm]] 23:45, 19 January 2007 (CET)
 +
::To be fair, it should be the other way around. The manual/lingo page is a "rip-off" of this page. -[[User:Pizarro|Pizarro]] 03:38, 20 January 2007 (CET)
 +
:::Whichever. I think the Acronyms page is better written, but the Lingo page has a few more. I guess the real question is "Does this deserve to be part of the manual?" If so, then merge that way. If not, then do move it out of the manual, and fix links as needed.

Latest revision as of 05:32, 20 January 2007

Do we really need this page? Practically all of it is duplicated on the Manual/Lingo page. Why not just roll this into that one, and be done with it? --Indirik 16:22, 19 January 2007 (CET)

Seconded. Too many acronym/short hand pages flying around. Jezralhm 23:45, 19 January 2007 (CET)
To be fair, it should be the other way around. The manual/lingo page is a "rip-off" of this page. -Pizarro 03:38, 20 January 2007 (CET)
Whichever. I think the Acronyms page is better written, but the Lingo page has a few more. I guess the real question is "Does this deserve to be part of the manual?" If so, then merge that way. If not, then do move it out of the manual, and fix links as needed.