Difference between revisions of "Talk:Keepers of Lore/Regions"

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (New page: A slightly more complete region list, but still has some holes: Category:Dwilight Regions. --~~~~)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
A slightly more complete region list, but still has some holes: [[:Category:Dwilight Regions]]. --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 12:47, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 
A slightly more complete region list, but still has some holes: [[:Category:Dwilight Regions]]. --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 12:47, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Is this an ideal way to do this? ==
 +
 +
While I applaud the creation of more RP and source material for Dwilight, I have to question the way it is being done. Is it really a good idea to build a completely separate list of regions and RP source material, isolated from the actual region pages? This information would get much more usage, and make a much bigger contribution to the game, if it were to be found on the true region page. Perhaps it could be placed on the region page under a separate heading, perhaps with a note pointing back to the Keepers of Lore. Then instead of building subpages here, you could just link to the standard region pages. A separate way of doing it would be to keep the information here, and then transclude it onto the official region page, like this: <nowiki>{{:Keepers of Lore/Regions/Askileon}}</nowiki>. Place that on the region page, and the entire contents of the named page would appear. This allows it to be in two places, but still be maintained by a single source. --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 15:54, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:54, 29 April 2009

A slightly more complete region list, but still has some holes: Category:Dwilight Regions. --Indirik 12:47, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Is this an ideal way to do this?

While I applaud the creation of more RP and source material for Dwilight, I have to question the way it is being done. Is it really a good idea to build a completely separate list of regions and RP source material, isolated from the actual region pages? This information would get much more usage, and make a much bigger contribution to the game, if it were to be found on the true region page. Perhaps it could be placed on the region page under a separate heading, perhaps with a note pointing back to the Keepers of Lore. Then instead of building subpages here, you could just link to the standard region pages. A separate way of doing it would be to keep the information here, and then transclude it onto the official region page, like this: {{:Keepers of Lore/Regions/Askileon}}. Place that on the region page, and the entire contents of the named page would appear. This allows it to be in two places, but still be maintained by a single source. --Indirik 15:54, 29 April 2009 (UTC)