Talk:Sultanate of Asena/The Valour of the Marsh

Oi, Jason... I think you should only state as truth (not as a point of view) that Vanya insulted Katan if Jason (and the scribes of the realm, I dunno), not Katan, believed that. I don't think the wiki page of the realm or armies should be so partial as to express the opinions of the characters as their own... Instead of believed you could put that Katan felt insulted. Doesn't take the credit from Katan and still shows that there might be room for speculation and discussion. :) Heh... Unless you are trying to actually pull Vanya into a fight with that? ;) - Bluelake 14:29, 10 June 2008 (CEST)

Actually, since the 'Origins' section is a historical account, it is more then valid to put points of views in. After all, History has always been written as a point of view, with the strongest accepted, which was usually written by the winner, and since that is the IC reason for the creation (well, the one that finally pushed him to do it), it has a more than valid place in the origin. ENDperorNoPants 14:51, 10 June 2008 (CEST)

Yeah, assuming it was he who wrote it... I think I was considering it was the realm's scribes who'd write what I call the library studies of the nobility, and they wouldn't write stuff so partially, but only insinuative (like in most of the non-IC-signed wiki pages)... at least I think so. Or wished so, heh :) - Bluelake 05:54, 11 June 2008 (CEST)