Difference between revisions of "User talk:Foreign Curs/Suggestion:Liberation Takeover"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Give it to allies? I don't think that's such a great idea... Just seems to further those unbreakable alliances. However, turning the region rogue, that would sound good. A quicker method than sitting and looting for weeks while the peasants keep interfering? -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 16:03, 1 March 2008 (CET) | Give it to allies? I don't think that's such a great idea... Just seems to further those unbreakable alliances. However, turning the region rogue, that would sound good. A quicker method than sitting and looting for weeks while the peasants keep interfering? -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 16:03, 1 March 2008 (CET) | ||
| + | :Now now you miss the concept of this. Realm A would perform the LTO in a region of the enemy realm B that does '''not''' border to the regions of realm A, but that '''does''' border to the regions of realm C, which is an ally of realm A. If a realm can't take a region, it's better off in the hands of an ally than in the hands of an enemy. [[User:Medium|Medium]] 16:23, 1 March 2008 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 17:23, 1 March 2008
Give it to allies? I don't think that's such a great idea... Just seems to further those unbreakable alliances. However, turning the region rogue, that would sound good. A quicker method than sitting and looting for weeks while the peasants keep interfering? -Chénier 16:03, 1 March 2008 (CET)
- Now now you miss the concept of this. Realm A would perform the LTO in a region of the enemy realm B that does not border to the regions of realm A, but that does border to the regions of realm C, which is an ally of realm A. If a realm can't take a region, it's better off in the hands of an ally than in the hands of an enemy. Medium 16:23, 1 March 2008 (CET)
