Template talk:Item Box

Convention in price ranges is low-to-high. Also, maybe a small break between those high and low, a dash or a "to". It also looks too blocky, maybe color the text instead of the background. More like:

Item

?, ? → ?, ?

?

(Sorry for the ugly code though, I'm not much for wiki or html coding and just had to find something to work) -- Neoro 05:30, 5 January 2007 (CET)

Well, I was trying to fanoodle with the price columns to make it so we could delete the zeros, as I kinda felt they were distracting, but I'm not really happy with it. Its not as space efficient and just looks a bit off. I deleted the zero's on the usable items page, check it and see what you think. Perhaps going back to before I added the "arrow" would be better? --JFS 22:56, 5 January 2007 (CET)

Regions

What exactly is the intended purpose of the "region" entry? I don't think it is serving much of a purpose.

Also, instead of providing a low and high price, perhaps we can make a more extensive table that lists just the high price for each region type: mountains, woodlands, badlands, rural, townsland, stronghold, and city? I'll work on an example... --JFS 17:46, 5 January 2007 (CET)

There was some suggestion regarding regions, on the old talk page, we can always take it out if need be. mcsporran 18:01, 5 January 2007 (CET)

Well there are probably several items that can only be found in certain areas. Region could be like Rural, Mountains, City, Badlands, All, etc-- Neoro 18:11, 5 January 2007 (CET)