Difference between revisions of "Talk:Toren (SEI)/Toren Victory Party"

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
::: You're dodging the question... this is jsut a thing for you to bash Toren. Honestly, get a hobby! [[User:George the Hippy|George the Hippy]] 17:59, 9 April 2007 (CEST)
 
::: You're dodging the question... this is jsut a thing for you to bash Toren. Honestly, get a hobby! [[User:George the Hippy|George the Hippy]] 17:59, 9 April 2007 (CEST)
 +
::::Of course it's just to bash Toren. Why? Because it's fun, and I have plenty of ammunition. And how am I dodging the question, when I wasn't even touching the subject of Toren politics? I don't have knowledge of you politics, other than the fact that your appointed military leaders are apparently unable to gain any significant victories, even with a 40,000 CS army on your side, against an outnumbered and outgunned enemy. That's all the knowledge I need to be able to point and laugh. -Sennianus the Mad [[User:Andrasta|Andrasta]] 18:04, 9 April 2007 (CEST)
  
  

Revision as of 18:04, 9 April 2007

Comments

You'd need to find the path to victory before you can think of straying from it. -Sennianus the Mad Andrasta 15:00, 9 April 2007 (CEST)

Uncalled for. This is just you being an idiot. You have IC knowledge of deep Toren politics? Thought not. George the Hippy 17:45, 9 April 2007 (CEST)
I don't need knowledge of Toren politics. All I need to do is look at the battle reports and the history of SEI over the past few months. Toren has won maybe one in seven major battles, and has made no gains whatsoever. Even with big brother Ikalak pulling attention away from you, you're still completely incapable of doing damage other than petty looting. -Sennianus the Mad Andrasta 17:57, 9 April 2007 (CEST)
You're dodging the question... this is jsut a thing for you to bash Toren. Honestly, get a hobby! George the Hippy 17:59, 9 April 2007 (CEST)
Of course it's just to bash Toren. Why? Because it's fun, and I have plenty of ammunition. And how am I dodging the question, when I wasn't even touching the subject of Toren politics? I don't have knowledge of you politics, other than the fact that your appointed military leaders are apparently unable to gain any significant victories, even with a 40,000 CS army on your side, against an outnumbered and outgunned enemy. That's all the knowledge I need to be able to point and laugh. -Sennianus the Mad Andrasta 18:04, 9 April 2007 (CEST)


Just as an ooc comment, saying that this party is committed to victory is not saying much...all realms on SEI should be committed to victory, and any political parties should hence be so committed or else they'll have little chance of gaining power. A better statement would be how you would attain this victory. I assume from the phrase "staying our course" that what is meant is maintaining the treaty with Ikalak. Perhaps you may wish to elaborate on how you will win against Ikalak after having defeated Taselak. --RubyDragon 17:19, 9 April 2007 (CEST)

We can't just divulge our deep secrets can we? George the Hippy 17:45, 9 April 2007 (CEST)

Comedy

I find it comical that you find the need to establish a completely OOC group of players and publish it, then insist that everyone remember it is OOC. Obviously, you feel an IC need for this OOC group - to respond to the Toren Reform Party. I wonder why you published it at all, if you don't want anyone to know about it. --Habap 17:52, 9 April 2007 (CEST)

It's secret for now. I just expect that we can all be mature enough to not go spilling these things. George the Hippy 17:59, 9 April 2007 (CEST)