Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Blackest Word/Volume Two"

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
 
Marouane, Duke of Massillion<br>
 
Marouane, Duke of Massillion<br>
 
-[[User:Tariq|Marouane]] 16:50, 16 September 2006 (CEST)
 
-[[User:Tariq|Marouane]] 16:50, 16 September 2006 (CEST)
 +
 +
Yet they're a group of suicidal morons, who may bring alot of good people with them. Hence the need to combat them. Maybe after I finish "The Summa" I will take the Blackest Bible chapter by chapter and deconstruct it, revealing the gigantic flaws in its logic. Heck, my stable-boy could write a more cohesive doctrine of evil, and he's one of the most morally upstanding stable-boys you've ever met. The reason the BC cant write a truly great doctrine of evil is because they're all evil. TO understand evil, you must be good. Its a matter of perspective. Yes, evil is defined by good people, because evil is that which is outside the bounds of good. Yes, good inhibits full freedom, because full freedom is detrimental to the progress of man. Cannabalism, as is scientifically proven, spreads disease and is catastrophically unhygenic, as does group/animal sex, it also spreads disease. Those are just two examples of course. While I disagree with Marouane's position that the ends always justify the means, there are times when a knife between the ribs is the correct course. [[User:Vellos|Vellos]] 16:57, 16 September 2006 (CEST)

Revision as of 16:57, 16 September 2006

How ironic, The Blackest Cult is the first to promote freedom to do whatever one wants, but when that freedom implies acting against the Cult, it's suddenly not alright anymore. Raping your own principles already... quite sad. -Marouane 21:34, 1 September 2006 (CEST)


Yeah...no doubt...unless its a secret ploy to protect someone who is very dedicated to protecting that freedom eh? if you notice, calling for Dafayo's death is directly agisnt all philosophies of the Blackest Bible, cult and movement...weird eh? Hmmmm...wonder how this happend...and why...hmmm.

Brian main

Elfabah was seen in the southern realms... although, your threats are enough to makeme not wantto tell you more. Especially since you could find it out yourself, with a bit of digging, since you know the continent. I am sorry to hear of the death of Vincent Von. San/--The1exile 00:08, 5 September 2006 (CEST)

It's a shame you had to run from the tournament, tail between your legs, before I could reply to your rambling. But what do you know, I get another chance:

First off, of course I'm an avid reader of your rag. I'm an avid reader of every paper or newsletter published in Atamara. Just because I read them, doesn't mean I'm a fan of your ramblings. It's my job to protect Eston from evil forces, and information is half the battle. Your rag has been most helpful in finding hotbeds of evil around the island. Not to mention it is a great source of 'say this, do that' on your part.

Second, about my alledged 'evilness': murder, spying, treason, ... these are neither good nor evil acts in themselves. They are merely tools used to obtain one's goals. These goals determine whether these tools are used for evil or for good. One who murders innocent life, betrays good men, or spies for evil powers, is an evil man. One who murders or betrays evil men, or spies for good powers, is a good man. For such an eloquent man, you sure miss the ability to read between the lines. Of course I deal with informants and assassins, they are a powerful tool in any war. Any man who claims otherwise is a fool.

Third, I do not wish death on everyone who speaks against me. I only wish death on you, and everyone of your deranged cronies. Not because you speak against me, but because you speak against anything that is good and honorable. Of course, I would very much like to see you suffer a gruesome end... I'm a supporter of poetic justice. Reap what you sow, Vatticus.

Fourth, if your rhetorics had made any sense, you would not fear a duel to the death with me, you would welcome it. Whatever the outcome, 'evil' shall win, according to your logic. Either the evil cultist kills the noble hero, or the evil hero kills the defenseless cultist. So, if you truly promote evil, you will accept a duel to the death with me. You yourself have stated that your death would not harm the cult, it would help it grow. So why won't you help your cult grow then? Also, the only reason I did not issue a duel challenge right there and then, was that the code of conduct forbade me to do it. Once the tournament is over, I'll have all the time in the world for a duel.

Fifth, what moral downfall are you talking about? If anything, Eston has become morally stronger since the Massillion Civil War, during which the self-serving, lying, backstabbing propagandists that once governed Eston were removed from power. If anything, evil has been removed from Eston, rather than spreading through the realm. It seems you need to pay your informants more money, because they have been feeding you a lot of rubbish.

Like I said before, you're not a prophet, your a populist. And not a very good one either, given the limited support for your cause at the tournament. You say a lot and promise a lot, but when push comes to shove, you're just another clown, too scared to defend his beliefs by the sword. If your cult was really as powerful as you claimed, your fatwa on Dafayo would have been carried out long ago. Yet, he is still his fat, jolly self, merrily travelling the globe selling his artwork.

Conclusion: The Blackest Cult is really just another group of morons on a suicide mission, with a cowardly nutcase at the helm.

Signed,

Marouane, Duke of Massillion
-Marouane 16:50, 16 September 2006 (CEST)

Yet they're a group of suicidal morons, who may bring alot of good people with them. Hence the need to combat them. Maybe after I finish "The Summa" I will take the Blackest Bible chapter by chapter and deconstruct it, revealing the gigantic flaws in its logic. Heck, my stable-boy could write a more cohesive doctrine of evil, and he's one of the most morally upstanding stable-boys you've ever met. The reason the BC cant write a truly great doctrine of evil is because they're all evil. TO understand evil, you must be good. Its a matter of perspective. Yes, evil is defined by good people, because evil is that which is outside the bounds of good. Yes, good inhibits full freedom, because full freedom is detrimental to the progress of man. Cannabalism, as is scientifically proven, spreads disease and is catastrophically unhygenic, as does group/animal sex, it also spreads disease. Those are just two examples of course. While I disagree with Marouane's position that the ends always justify the means, there are times when a knife between the ribs is the correct course. Vellos 16:57, 16 September 2006 (CEST)