Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Blackest Bible"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Surely thsat should be the other way around, that the rat called the snakle a slithering fool, and so on? --[[User:The1exile|The1exile]] 17:43, 11 August 2006 (CEST) | Surely thsat should be the other way around, that the rat called the snakle a slithering fool, and so on? --[[User:The1exile|The1exile]] 17:43, 11 August 2006 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Heh heh, it's like sadistic Logical Positivism. Incidentally, ''It is only the racist nature of man that projects the word “evil” on those who embrace the universal truths of life'' sounds dubious to me - the Blackest Bible is surely not claiming that evil is a matter of racial discrimination, but instead is claiming that it is ideological discrimination. Racism clouds the issue. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Similarly, during the last British General Election, the Conservative party had some posters up saying ''It's not racist to impose limits on immigration.'' Which is quite correct: it's ''xenophobic'', not racist (which to my mind is equally reprehensible). ''philoxenia'' ftw. | ||
| + | |||
| + | But anyway, I think that particular sentence could be reworked; perhaps the Blackest Bible could argue that the assignation of the tag 'evil' is analogous to racism? --[[User:Egregious|Egregious]] 19:40, 11 August 2006 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 19:40, 11 August 2006
The snake and the rat
Surely thsat should be the other way around, that the rat called the snakle a slithering fool, and so on? --The1exile 17:43, 11 August 2006 (CEST)
Heh heh, it's like sadistic Logical Positivism. Incidentally, It is only the racist nature of man that projects the word “evil” on those who embrace the universal truths of life sounds dubious to me - the Blackest Bible is surely not claiming that evil is a matter of racial discrimination, but instead is claiming that it is ideological discrimination. Racism clouds the issue.
Similarly, during the last British General Election, the Conservative party had some posters up saying It's not racist to impose limits on immigration. Which is quite correct: it's xenophobic, not racist (which to my mind is equally reprehensible). philoxenia ftw.
But anyway, I think that particular sentence could be reworked; perhaps the Blackest Bible could argue that the assignation of the tag 'evil' is analogous to racism? --Egregious 19:40, 11 August 2006 (CEST)
