Difference between revisions of "Talk:Taselak (SEI)/Tribune/3rd Edition"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Copycat: hmmm) |
m |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::To be honest, I don't think it's a particularly good use of space to either just list the battles or to list them as we have done. Also, there are no massive Toren armies anymore. Nor do they achieve victory. ;-) --[[User:Habap|Habap]] 22:44, 6 January 2007 (CET) | ::To be honest, I don't think it's a particularly good use of space to either just list the battles or to list them as we have done. Also, there are no massive Toren armies anymore. Nor do they achieve victory. ;-) --[[User:Habap|Habap]] 22:44, 6 January 2007 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | mine lays the facts as they are, without the nonscence, yours can be misleading, as for Toren having no more large armies that remains to be seen. still the fact that your paper is having anything added is good, it had a massive slowdown in december -- [[User:Shadow|Shadow]] 23:16, 6 January 2007 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 00:16, 7 January 2007
Copycat
may i be the first to say COPYCAT! on recent news, shame on you
Shadow 21:12, 5 January 2007 (CET)
- Isn't imitation the sincerest form of flattery? Though, actually, I don't think it's a copy, because this one has far more information about the battles. So, it's inspired by yours, I think. --Habap 22:27, 5 January 2007 (CET)
- not realy inspired, its a copy and paste of the rss news feed, it does filter any of the junk and provides info that realy isnt relevent such as the odd noble captured and what is the guessed combat strength. besides its information about battles is misleading for instance if one ikalakian noble joined a massive toren army and beat Taselak can that realy be classed as a victory for both Toren and Ikalak? -- Shadow 22:23, 6 January 2007 (CET)
- To be honest, I don't think it's a particularly good use of space to either just list the battles or to list them as we have done. Also, there are no massive Toren armies anymore. Nor do they achieve victory. ;-) --Habap 22:44, 6 January 2007 (CET)
mine lays the facts as they are, without the nonscence, yours can be misleading, as for Toren having no more large armies that remains to be seen. still the fact that your paper is having anything added is good, it had a massive slowdown in december -- Shadow 23:16, 6 January 2007 (CET)
