Difference between revisions of "Talk:Royalty"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Eirik felde (talk | contribs) |
Aralaiquendi (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
ok, let's say char X was a ruler in realm Y, he looses rulership somehow, and will a couple of months late try to rebel. (he is not rebelion leader) How can he then be banned? doesnt "royal" make you "unbannable"? [[User_talk:Eirik_felde]] | ok, let's say char X was a ruler in realm Y, he looses rulership somehow, and will a couple of months late try to rebel. (he is not rebelion leader) How can he then be banned? doesnt "royal" make you "unbannable"? [[User_talk:Eirik_felde]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | He can not, the point of Royalty is that althought they may not be ruler anymore, they are of royal blood so its their right to attempt to sieze the throne in something say like a rebellion.--[[User:Aralaiquendi|Aralaiquendi]] 25 January 2006 17:35 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:35, 25 January 2006
ok, let's say char X was a ruler in realm Y, he looses rulership somehow, and will a couple of months late try to rebel. (he is not rebelion leader) How can he then be banned? doesnt "royal" make you "unbannable"? User_talk:Eirik_felde
He can not, the point of Royalty is that althought they may not be ruler anymore, they are of royal blood so its their right to attempt to sieze the throne in something say like a rebellion.--Aralaiquendi 25 January 2006 17:35 (CET)
