Talk:Riombara/The Great War

Beautiful maps! I like maps! =D -- Gsklee 21:28, 17 October 2006 (CEST)

Thanks - I do like maps as well. Its so much easier to understand what someone is talking about - and they are perfect to make 'snapshots' of existing situation...now if there would be an easy way to copy the dynamic map into one jpg....TanSerrai 10:16, 18 October 2006 (CEST)

Kudos for the maps. Any chance of more anytime soon? Vellos 01:57, 27 October 2006 (CEST)

You wanted more maps? You get more maps....(insane grin)TanSerrai 13:01, 28 October 2006 (CEST)

This is a nice overvieuw of what is happening down south, but i must have a negative comment ;) 1) Fronen Capital is Fronopu and the circle on the map isn't really correct ;) 2) at the end your portraying Cs as troops when you say 18 000 you mean 18K cs and not troops. this isn't really accurate.

for the remainder your doing a good job.

May I suggest that you use 10CS for a man instead of 1CS for one? 10CS per man seems to be an approximate estimate. --Mithrandir Family 10:09, 9 November 2006 (CET)

Thanks for pointing out the wrong capital of Fronen, I'll correct it. As to CS: Right at the beginning I define (for RP purpose) 1 CS as 1 man. 1 man recruited in the game is seen (by me) as a pennant (1 knight plus 5-12 retainers). It just feels better to have mighty armies of 20.000 fighting it out than having 1000 assaulting - for example - a mighty fortress. Plus, it might just be 'historically' correct: In medieval armies often only knights were 'counted'. All others weren't considered worth much...more of a necessary evil. The fact that probably more battles were won by footmen than by armoured knights was conveniently ignored.TanSerrai 10:22, 9 November 2006 (CET)

By the way, you have an error. I had nothing to do with the Fronen Rebellion. Now, naturally, if you want to see me lurking behind every shadow, you're welcome to! But I was as surprised are you were when I saw, "Rebellion in Fronen!" Trust me, if it had been me running it, it would have gone off without a hitch. Namely, there would have been more rebels ready at the right time, and Enzeru would not have stepped down, thus making government reform impossible. Vellos 13:51, 17 January 2007 (CET)

thanks for that info. I think I'll correct it in the next update - still, as this is OOC info I don't know if Herkan would accept that at face value. Hireshmonts credibility has taken a serious dive after the Alaned-Retravic-Hireshmont treason... :) TanSerrai 17:19, 17 January 2007 (CET)