Difference between revisions of "Talk:Repute"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
House Olik (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I like, but I think good/bad marks should only get +/- 1 repute, since they're incredibly easy to give out. [[User:House Olik|House Olik]] 19:50, 12 April 2007 (CEST) | I like, but I think good/bad marks should only get +/- 1 repute, since they're incredibly easy to give out. [[User:House Olik|House Olik]] 19:50, 12 April 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | :True, but you can only have a very small number of them - 1 or 2. Also the entire society is (theoretically) based around a character fulfilling his duty to his lord. Any "repute" lost from a bad mark can be recovered by working hard to get back in your lord's good graces... and whatever the Lord requires for that to happen can generate some very good roleplay. -- [[User:Murakama|Murakama]] 20:09, 12 April 2007 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 20:09, 12 April 2007
I like, but I think good/bad marks should only get +/- 1 repute, since they're incredibly easy to give out. House Olik 19:50, 12 April 2007 (CEST)
- True, but you can only have a very small number of them - 1 or 2. Also the entire society is (theoretically) based around a character fulfilling his duty to his lord. Any "repute" lost from a bad mark can be recovered by working hard to get back in your lord's good graces... and whatever the Lord requires for that to happen can generate some very good roleplay. -- Murakama 20:09, 12 April 2007 (CEST)
