Talk:Realm Pages

I got to thinking that putting realms underneath each other for each continent is going to make this page waaay too long once were all done and leave a hell of alot of white space to the side. It didnt seem as bad on the old tiki...

So I just tried out a table for Atamara, and it doesnt look to bad. It's easy to add a realm to if you need to. It seems to look a little more organised and fills up the width of the page more aswell. Anyone have any thoughts on this? --Revan August 7, 2005 02:18 (CEST)

I like all the changes. Am I to assume that Portion (being italicised) is a Lost Realm? I like that stylistic note. I'll make those changes across the board and see how it looks. --John 7 August 2005 02:26 (CEST)

Yup, Portion is indeed a Lost Realm. I thought it would make it Clearer that way :) --Revan August 7, 2005 02:37 (CEST)

Oh yeah, alphebetizing... Any particular reason for ditching the italics? --John 7 August 2005 02:51 (CEST)

Hmm, well I did that because it was made much clearer in the table. But looking at Portion in Colonies it actually helps to make the Lost Realms stand out more, provides a contrast? I'll go change it --Revan August 7, 2005 03:02 (CEST)

Subpages

I'm not so sure about using subpages here. People will be searching for the realms by name, and if we give them their own pages, they will be brought straight to that page instead of a "search results" page.

Subpages are useful for things that really do belong together, essentially stuff that might have been written on one page as well. I don't think they're useful here.

--Tom 7 August 2005 09:46 (CEST)

Hmm well now I tried a search, I think I agree with you completely on that point. I just searched for Giblot and the first 8 results were our Newspaper, not our realm page. That would probably get worse the more pages you have about your realm :\ --Revan August 7, 2005 11:38 (CEST)