Difference between revisions of "Talk:Old Taxes 2"

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎overhaul again?: new section)
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 
the reflect the newest version of the tax system? (ie.. duke sets duchy share, etc) --[[User:Fodder|fodder]] 19:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 
the reflect the newest version of the tax system? (ie.. duke sets duchy share, etc) --[[User:Fodder|fodder]] 19:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
Yes, I think we should. I've updated the "example" page with the current system.

Revision as of 19:14, 8 August 2009

I moved a rather long example from this page to it's own page at Example:Region Economy. Feel free to discuss the inclusion of examples in the manual there.

Back when this system was still experimental, gsklee gave an analysis.

New tax system

In the new tax system you can reward TL's for there oath. But all TL's that already sweared alliance will not get any share of your tax because you can't send them a oath offer. --killercoach 23:20, 21 August 2006 (CEST)

Taxing Gold from players

Does anyone know how the gold individual players are taxed is calculated. It only occurs if you have an exorbanant amount of gold, upward of 130gold. It seems to be able to come from both bonds and gold on hand, but those are calculated seperately. Any ideas?

If you have over 100 gold and/or bonds you will be taxed at the realms tax rate. This is then redistributed throughout the realm. --The1exile 17:09, 21 August 2006 (CEST)

That annoys me so much. Not so much when I am in my realm, but when you are on long trips outside of your realm with just enough gold to pay your men, then boom, the tax man shows up... it doesn't make sense to have them collecting taxes from you when you are on campaign... Also, are these taxmen related in anyway to the Psychic Guards from The Elder Scrolls series? Heh heh. --PrinceScamp 06:50, 24 December 2006 (CET)

replace ?

We should probably replace this page with the new one, moving/renaming that one over. --Tom 00:31, 27 February 2008 (CET)

overhaul again?

the reflect the newest version of the tax system? (ie.. duke sets duchy share, etc) --fodder 19:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I think we should. I've updated the "example" page with the current system.