Difference between revisions of "Talk:Introduction"

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Didn't quite get all of it. Hope I didn't clear out anything important.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Discussion Formatting}}
 +
 
== Experiment ==
 
== Experiment ==
  
Line 7: Line 9:
 
So, what do you all think?
 
So, what do you all think?
 
--[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 23 July 2005 06:50 (CEST)
 
--[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 23 July 2005 06:50 (CEST)
 +
 +
:I like it. I say we make the wooden badger into a running joke. :-)-- [[User:Nicholas|Nicholas]] July 23, 2005 20:46 (CEST)
 +
 +
Also, I linked a few of the words in the article, (e.g. [[King]], [[Healer]], [[Keplerstan]], etc. ) I'm not sure if the basics page should have that many links though. It might be a little overwhelming. Please discuss. -- [[User:Nicholas|Nicholas]] July 23, 2005 20:46 (CEST)

Revision as of 20:46, 23 July 2005

Formatting

Please format your comments the same as everyone else. Otherwise it will quickly become unreadable. Your name should come immediately after everything you wrote. e.g.

I think that turnips should 
be considered a fruit. They are tasty and 
delicious, it only makes sense. -- ~~~~~

Note that 4 tildes will expand to your name and the date, 3 tildes will expand to just your name. 2 tildes will expand to simply the date.

You can also use one or more colons (:) in front of your paragraph to indent the text. More than one asterisk (*) will indent the bullet.

Experiment

OK, I realize it was a little forward to post such an important page without running it by everyone, but I really think you all will like it.

The basic idea is that the BattleMaster Basics section of the manual should be almost entirely roleplayed. I went with Tom's earlier idea, and embellished a bit and tried to make sure it would apply to a variety of cases (it's even gender-neutral!). The answers to the "questions" would also be roleplayed, which is why they're not links to the regular articles -- those links will be embedded in the answer pages, though.

So, what do you all think? --Dolohov 23 July 2005 06:50 (CEST)

I like it. I say we make the wooden badger into a running joke. :-)-- Nicholas July 23, 2005 20:46 (CEST)

Also, I linked a few of the words in the article, (e.g. King, Healer, Keplerstan, etc. ) I'm not sure if the basics page should have that many links though. It might be a little overwhelming. Please discuss. -- Nicholas July 23, 2005 20:46 (CEST)