Difference between revisions of "Talk:FAQ"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Would it be appropriate to go through the FAQ and link to pages that explain those sections of the game mechanic in-depth? I used the FAQ to some extent when writing the articles on Taxes and Battle. On the other hand, I'm not sure that it's a good idea to fill the FAQ with links. --[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 22 July 2005 18:08 (CEST) | :Would it be appropriate to go through the FAQ and link to pages that explain those sections of the game mechanic in-depth? I used the FAQ to some extent when writing the articles on Taxes and Battle. On the other hand, I'm not sure that it's a good idea to fill the FAQ with links. --[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 22 July 2005 18:08 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Some links for important topics would be useful, but not too many. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 24 July 2005 22:18 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 22:18, 24 July 2005
Formatting
Please format your comments the same as everyone else. Otherwise it will quickly become unreadable. Your name should come immediately after everything you wrote. e.g.
I think that turnips should be considered a fruit. They are tasty and delicious, it only makes sense. -- ~~~~~
Note that 4 tildes will expand to your name and the date, 3 tildes will expand to just your name. 2 tildes will expand to simply the date.
- You can also use one or more colons (:) in front of your paragraph to indent the text. More than one asterisk (*) will indent the bullet.
Why
Here's why I made it this way: Having the questions show up in the TOC might be useful, but it blows the TOC out of proportion. With many items, it becomes simply unuseable. --Tom 20 July 2005 10:42 (CEST)
- Would it be appropriate to go through the FAQ and link to pages that explain those sections of the game mechanic in-depth? I used the FAQ to some extent when writing the articles on Taxes and Battle. On the other hand, I'm not sure that it's a good idea to fill the FAQ with links. --Dolohov 22 July 2005 18:08 (CEST)
- Some links for important topics would be useful, but not too many. --Tom 24 July 2005 22:18 (CEST)
