Difference between revisions of "Talk:FAQ"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Here's why I made it this way: Having the questions show up in the TOC might be useful, but it blows the TOC out of proportion. With many items, it becomes simply unuseable. | Here's why I made it this way: Having the questions show up in the TOC might be useful, but it blows the TOC out of proportion. With many items, it becomes simply unuseable. | ||
--[[User:Tom|Tom]] 20 July 2005 10:42 (CEST) | --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 20 July 2005 10:42 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Would it be appropriate to go through the FAQ and link to pages that explain those sections of the game mechanic in-depth? I used the FAQ to some extent when writing the articles on Taxes and Battle. On the other hand, I'm not sure that it's a good idea to fill the FAQ with links. --[[User:Dolohov|Dolohov]] 22 July 2005 18:08 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 18:08, 22 July 2005
Here's why I made it this way: Having the questions show up in the TOC might be useful, but it blows the TOC out of proportion. With many items, it becomes simply unuseable. --Tom 20 July 2005 10:42 (CEST)
- Would it be appropriate to go through the FAQ and link to pages that explain those sections of the game mechanic in-depth? I used the FAQ to some extent when writing the articles on Taxes and Battle. On the other hand, I'm not sure that it's a good idea to fill the FAQ with links. --Dolohov 22 July 2005 18:08 (CEST)
