Difference between revisions of "Talk:Everguard Visionary/Issue 3"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If the Daily is a 'rag', and full of 'rantings', Why does the Great ex High King Fisc of the shining and everlasting realm of Everguard even write for it? | If the Daily is a 'rag', and full of 'rantings', Why does the Great ex High King Fisc of the shining and everlasting realm of Everguard even write for it? | ||
| − | |||
::Its in character bud, try to relax. [[User:Arylon|Arylon]] 05:52, 21 May 2008 (CEST) | ::Its in character bud, try to relax. [[User:Arylon|Arylon]] 05:52, 21 May 2008 (CEST) | ||
| + | :::And erm, my upper sentence was purely IC... [[User:Ceorl|Ceorl]] 06:10, 21 May 2008 (CEST) | ||
| − | + | ''....not spoken to the colony in question, and simply moved in to crush it at our leisure, pressing our claims backed by our military machine.'' | |
| − | : | + | :Is this the self-same 'military machine', that allowed Everguard to disintegrate into a patchwork of isolated and underpopulated regions? If so, then I don't think Astrum or Viridian or Caerwyn have too much to worry about. I also find it somewhat amusing that the Visionary would make claims of propaganda and lies against the Chronicle and the Daily, when it has hitherto been written by the ruler of the realm it supports. I'd say that presents a rather difficult case for proving even-sided and impartial reporting upon events concerning your own realm. --[[User:Bob|Bob]] 2:10pm, 22 May 2008 (AEST) |
Revision as of 06:13, 22 May 2008
If the Daily is a 'rag', and full of 'rantings', Why does the Great ex High King Fisc of the shining and everlasting realm of Everguard even write for it?
....not spoken to the colony in question, and simply moved in to crush it at our leisure, pressing our claims backed by our military machine.
- Is this the self-same 'military machine', that allowed Everguard to disintegrate into a patchwork of isolated and underpopulated regions? If so, then I don't think Astrum or Viridian or Caerwyn have too much to worry about. I also find it somewhat amusing that the Visionary would make claims of propaganda and lies against the Chronicle and the Daily, when it has hitherto been written by the ruler of the realm it supports. I'd say that presents a rather difficult case for proving even-sided and impartial reporting upon events concerning your own realm. --Bob 2:10pm, 22 May 2008 (AEST)
