Difference between revisions of "Talk:Beluaterra/Fifth Invasion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Ultimatum: new section) |
Sypherwolf (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Note: For RP reasons I would suggest to use the date 1011 instead of 2011. I like to include dates every now and then but find our realworld date does not 'mesh' with the world of BM. [[User:TanSerrai|TanSerrai]] 13:55, 3 December 2011 (CET) | Note: For RP reasons I would suggest to use the date 1011 instead of 2011. I like to include dates every now and then but find our realworld date does not 'mesh' with the world of BM. [[User:TanSerrai|TanSerrai]] 13:55, 3 December 2011 (CET) | ||
| + | Should the Daimon descriptions be moved to another page? It isn't really 5th invasion specific and might fit better on the wiki page for Daimons. [[User:Sypherwolf|Sypherwolf]] 03:21, 13 January 2012 (CET) | ||
== Ultimatum == | == Ultimatum == | ||
Whoever is interested in keeping this page updated - instead of day-by-day details, major events like the Overlord ultimatum should definitely be mentioned. They provide more of a narrative than "x was seen in y". --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 16:25, 12 December 2011 (CET) | Whoever is interested in keeping this page updated - instead of day-by-day details, major events like the Overlord ultimatum should definitely be mentioned. They provide more of a narrative than "x was seen in y". --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 16:25, 12 December 2011 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 04:21, 13 January 2012
Note: For RP reasons I would suggest to use the date 1011 instead of 2011. I like to include dates every now and then but find our realworld date does not 'mesh' with the world of BM. TanSerrai 13:55, 3 December 2011 (CET)
Should the Daimon descriptions be moved to another page? It isn't really 5th invasion specific and might fit better on the wiki page for Daimons. Sypherwolf 03:21, 13 January 2012 (CET)
Ultimatum
Whoever is interested in keeping this page updated - instead of day-by-day details, major events like the Overlord ultimatum should definitely be mentioned. They provide more of a narrative than "x was seen in y". --Tom 16:25, 12 December 2011 (CET)
