Difference between revisions of "Talk:Anti Instantaneous Message Petition"

From BattleMaster Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (turn junkies???)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Although i am actually against this new idea i like having someone putting also another point of view and giving reasons which will surely follow soon. - [[User:Shoenaemaeh|Shoenaemaeh]] 2 May 2006 20:36 (CEST)
 
Although i am actually against this new idea i like having someone putting also another point of view and giving reasons which will surely follow soon. - [[User:Shoenaemaeh|Shoenaemaeh]] 2 May 2006 20:36 (CEST)
 
:Could you explain what you mean with "ending with Turn Junkies"? Thanks - [[User:Shoenaemaeh|Shoenaemaeh]] 2 May 2006 20:42 (CEST)
 
:Could you explain what you mean with "ending with Turn Junkies"? Thanks - [[User:Shoenaemaeh|Shoenaemaeh]] 2 May 2006 20:42 (CEST)
 +
 +
Already added one i found on the other page. - [[User:Shoenaemaeh|Shoenaemaeh]] 2 May 2006 21:47 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 21:47, 2 May 2006

I'm actually more of a fence sitter here, but there are two sides to every argument folks.

And REMEMBER: Tom has only expressed an interest in a staggered message system so far. What his eventual decision shall be is hardly set in stone

- Revan

Although i am actually against this new idea i like having someone putting also another point of view and giving reasons which will surely follow soon. - Shoenaemaeh 2 May 2006 20:36 (CEST)

Could you explain what you mean with "ending with Turn Junkies"? Thanks - Shoenaemaeh 2 May 2006 20:42 (CEST)

Already added one i found on the other page. - Shoenaemaeh 2 May 2006 21:47 (CEST)