Talk:Arcaea/Military Archives/The War of Sartania's Destruction

From BattleMaster Wiki
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

"Instantly a devastating success"? The first attack on Niel was a draw. --Roy 06:41, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

I could say this is what Caim remembers of the war... but I do know that I arrived a turn early and got slaughtered. The following battle saw this Arcaea/Military Archives/A Feast in Niel, which were the same circumstances as Topenah where the infantry managed to get onto the walls fast enough due to a large number of siege engines that the fortifications were not nearly as effective.--Aerywyn 06:50, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
I was the Duke of Niel at that time. I believe 3 battles have been fought, the first a draw and the second and third were a victory for Arcaea. We had lvl 5 walls, and I am sure the CS displayed in "A Feast in Niel" is not true, neither from Arcaea nor Sartania. However, I can not prove anything, as it are just memories, but I can say with 99% certainty that the first battle in Niel was a draw, and that the numbers of CS are false. That aside, I am not a Arcaean historian, and you may write whatever you want. If you wish to write to have tricked us with a Trojan Horse, be my guest. However, a little accuracy probably won't harm a good story. --Roy 15:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Actually, the CS numbers are true. I remember, because I was writing a letter to demand the General to step down for attacking with such odds, and waited until turn so I could post the casualties we took in the failed assault...And couldn't believe my eyes when I saw we won. We ended up having something like 1 SE per 8 men or something like that, and the walls ended up providing almost no defense. I went and talked to Tim about it because I thought for sure it was a bug, but he checked the battle and the code and said it looked fine. I don't remember which attack that was, though. Shwartzring 23:34, 15 September 2010 (UTC)