Difference between revisions of "Talk:Honour and Recruitment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Nothing links here and the page serves no obvious purpose. Please update to include it properly in the wiki or I'll consider it abandoned and delete it. --~~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Nothing links here and the page serves no obvious purpose. Please update to include it properly in the wiki or I'll consider it abandoned and delete it. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 10:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | Nothing links here and the page serves no obvious purpose. Please update to include it properly in the wiki or I'll consider it abandoned and delete it. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 10:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Warrior/Cavalier with 906 honor | ||
| + | Infantry: ~315 men | ||
| + | Archers: ~315 men | ||
| + | Cavalry: ~130 men | ||
| + | Mixed Infantry: ~315 men | ||
| + | Special Forces: ~105 men | ||
| + | Cavalier gives a 20% buff to recruitment limits, except for cav which is 50%, iirc. The formula is clearly not linear with 1 man per point. Either there are different linear formulas for different ranges of honor, or one non-linear one. As far as I can tell, there's no cap. My limits keep (very slowly) increasing, and these values are relatively new for this character. --[[User:Chénier|Dominic "Chénier"]] ([[User talk:Chénier|talk]]) 15:58, 4 November 2018 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:58, 4 November 2018
Nothing links here and the page serves no obvious purpose. Please update to include it properly in the wiki or I'll consider it abandoned and delete it. --Tom 10:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Warrior/Cavalier with 906 honor
Infantry: ~315 men Archers: ~315 men Cavalry: ~130 men Mixed Infantry: ~315 men Special Forces: ~105 men
Cavalier gives a 20% buff to recruitment limits, except for cav which is 50%, iirc. The formula is clearly not linear with 1 man per point. Either there are different linear formulas for different ranges of honor, or one non-linear one. As far as I can tell, there's no cap. My limits keep (very slowly) increasing, and these values are relatively new for this character. --Dominic "Chénier" (talk) 15:58, 4 November 2018 (CET)
