Talk:De Bardt Family: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:They were part of the wanted pages list and nothing had been done for over a year. Instead of having the dead links sit there, I removed them. I'm not opposed to having character detail pages, just ones with no content for over a year. I apologize if you were about to add some content, but I thought the chances were greater that nothing was going to be done to them. --[[User:Bishamon Family|Vita Family]] 01:48, 17 January 2009 (CET) | :They were part of the wanted pages list and nothing had been done for over a year. Instead of having the dead links sit there, I removed them. I'm not opposed to having character detail pages, just ones with no content for over a year. I apologize if you were about to add some content, but I thought the chances were greater that nothing was going to be done to them. --[[User:Bishamon Family|Vita Family]] 01:48, 17 January 2009 (CET) | ||
==Headers== | |||
Hey, I might suggest using headers like in the [[Meta:Article example|example article]]. --[[User:Bishamon Family|Vita Family]] 02:14, 17 January 2009 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:14, 17 January 2009
Character Pages
Bishamon, why did you strip the links to my character detail pages? --De Bardt 01:32, 17 January 2009 (CET)
- They were part of the wanted pages list and nothing had been done for over a year. Instead of having the dead links sit there, I removed them. I'm not opposed to having character detail pages, just ones with no content for over a year. I apologize if you were about to add some content, but I thought the chances were greater that nothing was going to be done to them. --Vita Family 01:48, 17 January 2009 (CET)
Headers
Hey, I might suggest using headers like in the example article. --Vita Family 02:14, 17 January 2009 (CET)