Talk:Anti Instantaneous Message Petition: Difference between revisions
Shoenaemaeh (talk | contribs) m (turn junkies???) |
Shoenaemaeh (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Although i am actually against this new idea i like having someone putting also another point of view and giving reasons which will surely follow soon. - [[User:Shoenaemaeh|Shoenaemaeh]] 2 May 2006 20:36 (CEST) | Although i am actually against this new idea i like having someone putting also another point of view and giving reasons which will surely follow soon. - [[User:Shoenaemaeh|Shoenaemaeh]] 2 May 2006 20:36 (CEST) | ||
:Could you explain what you mean with "ending with Turn Junkies"? Thanks - [[User:Shoenaemaeh|Shoenaemaeh]] 2 May 2006 20:42 (CEST) | :Could you explain what you mean with "ending with Turn Junkies"? Thanks - [[User:Shoenaemaeh|Shoenaemaeh]] 2 May 2006 20:42 (CEST) | ||
Already added one i found on the other page. - [[User:Shoenaemaeh|Shoenaemaeh]] 2 May 2006 21:47 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:47, 2 May 2006
I'm actually more of a fence sitter here, but there are two sides to every argument folks.
And REMEMBER: Tom has only expressed an interest in a staggered message system so far. What his eventual decision shall be is hardly set in stone
- Revan
Although i am actually against this new idea i like having someone putting also another point of view and giving reasons which will surely follow soon. - Shoenaemaeh 2 May 2006 20:36 (CEST)
- Could you explain what you mean with "ending with Turn Junkies"? Thanks - Shoenaemaeh 2 May 2006 20:42 (CEST)
Already added one i found on the other page. - Shoenaemaeh 2 May 2006 21:47 (CEST)