Difference between revisions of "Talk:Irombrozia/Royal Family"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Don't you think it should be "eldest child", and not "first born" child? If the first-born dies, in a real monarchy, the next eldest child would have the throne, unless I'm mistakened... -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 00:49, 5 February 2007 (CET) | Don't you think it should be "eldest child", and not "first born" child? If the first-born dies, in a real monarchy, the next eldest child would have the throne, unless I'm mistakened... -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 00:49, 5 February 2007 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | First-born is preferential. I'll add another clause for eldest. [[User:Vellos|Vellos]] 05:35, 5 February 2007 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:35, 5 February 2007
Don't you think it should be "eldest child", and not "first born" child? If the first-born dies, in a real monarchy, the next eldest child would have the throne, unless I'm mistakened... -Chénier 00:49, 5 February 2007 (CET)
First-born is preferential. I'll add another clause for eldest. Vellos 05:35, 5 February 2007 (CET)
