Difference between revisions of "Talk:Region Claim"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ScottSabin (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:True but both side would do that then all regions would become claimed. They could abuse the cease-fire and then we would have eternal war, as nobody would trust each other to keep the cease-fire longer than one turn [[User:ScottSabin|ScottSabin]] 19 April 2006 18:14 (CEST) | :True but both side would do that then all regions would become claimed. They could abuse the cease-fire and then we would have eternal war, as nobody would trust each other to keep the cease-fire longer than one turn [[User:ScottSabin|ScottSabin]] 19 April 2006 18:14 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | What if realm B claims realm B's region, but then B's foderation member, realm C then TO's the region. Does this not mean a federation member would have a claim on one of your regions, which would never be able to be resolved? I mean, you can''t exactly improve relations from there. --[[User:Eurtek|Eurtek]] 19 April 2006 19:49 (CEST) |
Revision as of 19:49, 19 April 2006
Wouldnt this result in a lot of Cease-fires. Then a lot more declaring of war as soon as the claims are decided? ScottSabin 19 April 2006 17:31 (CEST)
- If a realm makes it a habit of doing that, then they will find their enemies unwilling to sign future cease-fires. --Indirik 19 April 2006 18:03 (CEST)
- True but both side would do that then all regions would become claimed. They could abuse the cease-fire and then we would have eternal war, as nobody would trust each other to keep the cease-fire longer than one turn ScottSabin 19 April 2006 18:14 (CEST)
What if realm B claims realm B's region, but then B's foderation member, realm C then TO's the region. Does this not mean a federation member would have a claim on one of your regions, which would never be able to be resolved? I mean, you cant exactly improve relations from there. --Eurtek 19 April 2006 19:49 (CEST)