Talk:The Blackest Laws of Evil
Hmm, with all due respect, evil nevers calls itself evil. Good calls what it doesn't like evil. :) Malitia
- Outer Tilog, which he talks about, is evil, and very open about it. AlexTurner 16:34, 10 August 2006 (CEST)
I don't know what Kant would say . . . but then, that might be because it's been a while since I learned any German.--Egregious 16:09, 10 August 2006 (CEST)
Evil is stated as a figure head or bumper sticker. Such a word has no real meaning to a real "evil" Open accepting of the titles the world places on you is the first step to turning such titles into powerless words. It has been done in countless fasions since the time of Socrates. Infact, alot of the philosphy here is based on Socrates, neizchie, Anton Lebay's works, Nazism, basic cult propaganda, etc etc.
Some of it is cut right from the best selling book "the 48 rules of power" by robert greene, and alot of it is based on many views that cuased alot of pain in th real world. Evil is NOT the danger here. The danger lies in its dimplomecy and attempts to gather all evils of all types under one flag or partnership.
Vashmere
What happens if an evil person calls himself evil? Is he now good? No... he's still evil. He may even know what he should do, and choose not do. He may have all the philosophical stuff figured out and go, "Oh, I know X is good, and in not doing X I am doing wrong. Thus, I choose not to do X." He then knows he is evil, and he is in fact still evil. Saying, "I am evil" doesnt suddenly make him not evil. Evil can call itself evil just as easily as good can call itself good. Vellos 20:45, 10 August 2006 (CEST)
But thanks for debating this. Its very good to have such things considered and disected. And thanks to exile for fixing the two rules numbered 3. Man I am horrible at editing. Vatticus
