Difference between revisions of "Talk:New Attributes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Purpose of page, suggestions) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Another way to lower repute == | == Another way to lower repute == | ||
*What about adding that having idle estate lowers your repute? --[[User:M2rt|M2rt]] 14:11, 9 August 2007 (CEST) | *What about adding that having idle estate lowers your repute? --[[User:M2rt|M2rt]] 14:11, 9 August 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Purpose of page, suggestions == | ||
| + | * It's not clear to me whether this page is for speculation about what changes these attributes, suggestions of ideas, or things that definitely change them. Clarification might help. --[[User:Dolohov|John]] 18:03, 9 August 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | * Also, some ideas: If possible, Adventurers should get chivarly points when they post monster/undead links that other people follow. One of my biggest problems with the adventurer class is how many people are selfish with those links and thus prevent everyone getting the larger prizes. For region commanders, just courts should either raise repute or lower notoriety. --[[User:Dolohov|John]] 18:03, 9 August 2007 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 18:03, 9 August 2007
Another way to lower repute
- What about adding that having idle estate lowers your repute? --M2rt 14:11, 9 August 2007 (CEST)
Purpose of page, suggestions
- It's not clear to me whether this page is for speculation about what changes these attributes, suggestions of ideas, or things that definitely change them. Clarification might help. --John 18:03, 9 August 2007 (CEST)
- Also, some ideas: If possible, Adventurers should get chivarly points when they post monster/undead links that other people follow. One of my biggest problems with the adventurer class is how many people are selfish with those links and thus prevent everyone getting the larger prizes. For region commanders, just courts should either raise repute or lower notoriety. --John 18:03, 9 August 2007 (CEST)
