Talk:Falasan Inquirer/March07

Poll

Just change the number of whichever option you choose to be one larger than it was before ;) For those non-wiki fluent readers: Click on the 'edit' tab at the top of the page. Then replace the number of the option you chose with another that's greater by 1, scroll down, and click on 'Save page'. And you're done! These instructions will also remain on the 'edit' page, but you'll be able to edit those as well...so be careful ;)

Note: I'm not sure, but you may need to create an account (which is free) in order to edit the page.

Great! I love it!

Votes: 3 

It's an improvement.

Votes: 0

Meh. Nothing much, it's all the same to me.

Votes: 0

It could be better.

Votes: 0

It's terrible! It was better before!

Votes: 0

Some parts are good, some are bad.

Votes: 1

Selective reporting

Selective reporting, I see? -Francisco Pizarro 01:41, 6 March 2007 (CET)

Well, it is a lot easier to write about events on which there's a lot of information or interest about. If you're referring to the Belegmon failure, you shouldn't be surprised that Reilwin would try to gloss over the juicy details of how Falasan's army got completely smashed ;) or were you talking about something else? --RubyDragon 00:42, 9 March 2007 (CET)

Oops, just noticed the date you wrote that at :S I guess you pointing out the lack of articles on anything but the Menedor battle, lol --RubyDragon 00:44, 9 March 2007 (CET)

Instantaneous Newspapers

quote: Editor's note: While other papers may employ sorcery and witchcraft to instantaneous transport their news across the continent, the Falasan Inquirer refuses to stoop to such a level and contents itself with simple carts and wagons. As such, do not be surprised if you encounter new articles that are released at an older date than is current.

- you can argue that messages are sent by carrier pigeon. Thus, almost instantaneous articles can be made.

jambo

Well, my thinking went that while single messages could do that, newspaper would be bulky items carried en masse from a printing press in the city to the surrounding regions. Admittedly, there's on average about 80-100 nobles in a realm, but when a paper is expected to be read by the entire continent, and you include the npc lesser nobles/land-owners who managed the estates, why, then it gets into the order of thousands of copies.

Admittedly, the time can be reduced if the paper has multiple printing presses spread out for optimal distribution, and single copies are sent out from the headquarters to the outlying printing presses, but I'm afraid that the distribution of newspapers using pigeons in bulk would not feasible.

True, the size of BM's newspapers has little to compare with today's modern newspapers, but then again, if we stuck to reality, BM wouldn't have the printing presses to print those newspapers in the first place. So if we take the newspapers presented to have the lesser articles of no interest to the player characters, but of interest to the npcs, to have been removed, then BM newspapers could be assumed to have a size comparable to that of today's newspaper...I don't see carrier pigeons transporting that kind of newspaper, unless it's an african swallow :p (see Monty Python if you didn't get that last comment).

In any case, yes, there are ways to reduce the lag without resorting to accusations of sorcery...but it's really an excuse as to why I often publish articles which are outdated by several days, and points an accusing finger, glowing in bright, neon lights, at other newspapers :p --RubyDragon 05:47, 18 March 2007 (CET)

Pretty

The new design is pretty. I'm glad someone liked my designs and was able to adapt from them. if you really want to, you could go as as looking at Kazuma's Aenilian Times but that does not have a set layout and is more like a magazine. Whatever suits you best good Reilwin. -- Nami

BoM in Menedor

Pish posh! Had you been able to read, you would have noticed that the Barony troops in menedor tried to evade the battle. Those who foufht were spotted by your troops, so perhaps you should blame yourself. -Pizarro 19:31, 25 March 2007 (CEST)