Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aquilegia/Chersonis Themata"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Unless someone can update this constantly, "members" isn't a good idea to have on there. Marshals and second in commands are important, but not really the members. Members who are notable ...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Unless someone can update this constantly, "members" isn't a good idea to have on there. Marshals and second in commands are important, but not really the members. Members who are notable for advice or tactics maybe, but not the majority of them. - Vesuvis | Unless someone can update this constantly, "members" isn't a good idea to have on there. Marshals and second in commands are important, but not really the members. Members who are notable for advice or tactics maybe, but not the majority of them. - Vesuvis | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I will be making something similar to the Virovene army, with awards or something like that for the Chersonis army. - Vesuvis | ||
Latest revision as of 02:00, 4 April 2009
Unless someone can update this constantly, "members" isn't a good idea to have on there. Marshals and second in commands are important, but not really the members. Members who are notable for advice or tactics maybe, but not the majority of them. - Vesuvis
I will be making something similar to the Virovene army, with awards or something like that for the Chersonis army. - Vesuvis
