Difference between revisions of "FAQ/Tom's Position on Names"

From BattleMaster Wiki
< FAQ
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 4: Line 4:
 
*[http://news.battlemaster.org/archives/discuss/2005-September/004223.html Fri Sep 2 ''16:03:38 CEST 2005'']
 
*[http://news.battlemaster.org/archives/discuss/2005-September/004223.html Fri Sep 2 ''16:03:38 CEST 2005'']
  
I'd like to stop this before it gets out of hands so much that I need
+
I think this bears repeating  because the whole damn discussion circles
to drop a hammer.
+
around it:
  
 +
There is no thing like atheism in a medieval world, and much less in a
 +
fantasy medieval-like world. People believe in Gods. If any of your
 +
characters seriously claims he doesn't, I'll gladly lightning bolt him
 +
into serious wounds until he does.
  
Remember the "benefit of the doubt" rule when banning someone for a bad
+
Religion has been a very central part of life for almost all of human
name choice. And remember that in the real world, some people DO HAVE
+
existence. It's been 200 years or so that people have even started to
bad and/or unusual names.
+
doubt religion as a concept. For 99% of human history the only question
 +
was _which_ religion was the right one.
  
 +
Those who have priest characters can tell you that "no belief" or "no
 +
religion" does not appear in-game anywhere, it's not mentioned even
 +
once. All the un-converted peasants, for example, aren't atheists - they
 +
are followers of some local pagan religions.
  
Some cases are clear cut. Anyone named IWannaF*ckYourMum deserves a
 
kick no questions asked and no mercy granted.
 
  
But there are many borderline cases. People with names like Stoopid or
+
So if any ruler makes a stink about it, I'll be very harsh to him. Once
Ehlrond. Maybe they can't type but maybe they really just like that
+
again, did you guys READ the inalienable rights page? Among other things
name no matter that it's close to something that YOU don't want to see
+
it explains WHY the rules are there - they are OOC fun preserving tools.  
in the game.
+
They serve to ensure that everyone can play the game the way he or she
 
+
likes.
 
+
Babbling about "atheism" and forbidding priests is OOC fun destructive -
Please reserve banning for names for the really clear cut cases. In the
+
it keeps people from experiencing the priest career, and thus a part of
case of doubt - let the guy stay!
+
the game.

Revision as of 21:30, 28 December 2009

Quote from Tom on character names.

Character Names

I think this bears repeating because the whole damn discussion circles around it:

There is no thing like atheism in a medieval world, and much less in a fantasy medieval-like world. People believe in Gods. If any of your characters seriously claims he doesn't, I'll gladly lightning bolt him into serious wounds until he does.

Religion has been a very central part of life for almost all of human existence. It's been 200 years or so that people have even started to doubt religion as a concept. For 99% of human history the only question was _which_ religion was the right one.

Those who have priest characters can tell you that "no belief" or "no religion" does not appear in-game anywhere, it's not mentioned even once. All the un-converted peasants, for example, aren't atheists - they are followers of some local pagan religions.


So if any ruler makes a stink about it, I'll be very harsh to him. Once again, did you guys READ the inalienable rights page? Among other things it explains WHY the rules are there - they are OOC fun preserving tools. They serve to ensure that everyone can play the game the way he or she likes. Babbling about "atheism" and forbidding priests is OOC fun destructive - it keeps people from experiencing the priest career, and thus a part of the game.